Post # 655 WHAT’S IN A WORD *

In our view, of all the myriad definitions of the noun, ”word” ultimately, the most foundational and useful, is: “A grouping of letters that has meaning when it is spoken or written.” Languages, as known, made up of collections [lexicons or vocabularies] of words, empirically enable members of society, to desirably and meaningfully, construe sentences and thereby, express to others their thoughts, feelings, and observations.  In this writing, we have elected to comment on three categories of word use:  [1] the careful and intentional selection of words, by capable authors as perceived by unsophisticated reader comments concerning, “big” versus, “easy” words, [2] the careless reliance on synonyms, and finally, [3] the tactical use of words as misleading propaganda.

[1] “Big” and “simple” words:

We have encountered such comments all too often, most especially, among people who choose not to spend their leisure time, reading. Often, the critical observation often is “He uses so many big words, that I cannot understand him.” In such instances, the infrequent reader, having trouble comprehending the meaning of the written work, defensively, and unjustly, shifts the blame, for his disturbing incomprehension, to the author. We have, indeed, at times, heard this complaint, albeit, regarding the greatest and most communicative of authors, as well as respecting the modest essays offered at plinyblog. It is very disconcerting but, simply, revelatory of the inexperience of the reader.

We will emphatically, declare without exception, that there is no legitimate, aesthetic category as “big words” or, “simple” words. It is true that some words do have more letters or syllables in them, or perhaps, may not be everyday, conversational words, but considerations of the size, and perceived complexity of words, are absolutely and entirely irrelevant. Any capable author, possessing the adequate level of skill and sensitivity for precise description, is unconcerned with the number of syllables in his carefully and contextually, chosen words. Words are selectively employed which, in the judgment of the writer, best express or describe the feeling or perception, intended to be conveyed to the reader. The following category, “[2]” may be read in conjunction with “[1].”

[2] Undue reliance on synonyms:

A thesaurus or other recognized listing of “synonyms” or “antonyms” provide similar words; and it is certainly acceptable to consult these sources for synonyms, but with the essential proviso, than mere similarity in meaning does not usually equate to replication of desired context or desired expression. Where there is choice, the closest word to the closest to the intended transmittal of feeling or description, with no other qualifications, should be utilized, by the author.

Illustrative examples of legitimate “synonyms” which, as usual, mutually differ in contextual meaning and desired impression.

[a] “quick”, “fast”, “swift”: [comment] To do something in a quick manner, is merely to distinguish it from “slow.” The adjective “fast” would be applicable to a flowing stream [ as would “swift.”] A winning horse would best be described as “swift,” certainly not “quick.”

[b] “look”, “see,” “glare, “stare”:[comment] To” look” is merely to direct one’s attention and not necessarily to see. To “see,” is simply, to visually experience. To “stare” is to fixedly look at an object. To “glare” is to angrily stare.

[c]  “present,” ”gift, award”:  [comment] A “present” connotes an item brought by a dinner guest or delivered on an occasion like a birthday or anniversary. The word, “gift” also has legal or official suggestion or, alternatively, the recognition of a revealed talent. “Award” necessarily implies a recognized contest, or problem and a successful win or accomplishment.

[d] “hot,” “spicy,” “torrid,” “sweltering”:[comment] “hot’ can refer to the ambient temperature, or the spicy taste of chilies, ”torrid” or “sultry” can imply sexy. “Sweltering means uncomfortably hot.

We could cite virtually every word in our language with its characteristic availability of numerous synonyms or antonyms, and yet, rarely see an identity in contextual mood or intended color. An experienced and capable author employs words that are selectively chosen, to convey an intended mood or personal message to the receptive reader.

[3] The tactically false use of words as propaganda:

The existence and intrinsic use of words, viz., the communication to others of information and ideas, is, unfortunately, vulnerable to use in tactical perversion and misrepresentation, for sub-rosa motives. The following are four examples of the pernicious [mis]use of words for concealed purposes;

[1] “Right to Life.” The most detestable and fraudulent example of misrepresentation by words is the cynical and tactical use of this benevolent-sounding name. The right-wing opponents to abortion have pirated three inarguably, positive words to shield their malign purposes, whether they be based on religious, faux moral, or, simply, the unvarnished desire for political and financial influence. Holding themselves out to be moral protectors of life, by their organizational name and deceitful public pretentions, and in their strict opposition to a woman’s choice, when needed, to terminate her own early pregnancy. Their purported representation of the group to be the protectors of the life of the fetus [“life”], is empirically belied by their adamant opposition to governmental assistance to the needy child, following the event of birth. The falsity of their dedication to” “life” is also irrefutably demonstrated by their commission of premeditated murder of physicians and others assisting in abortions, their support of the purported right to own guns, and their support of capital punishment, the latter items, inarguably, agents of death and inarguably, the anthesis of life.

[2] “Socialism”:

 America’s menagerie of pro-Trump, underbelly denizens, are content to label every empathic and necessary governmental expression of compassionate Capitalism, as their [misunderstood] newly created epithet, “Socialist”. They are, nonetheless, happy to pocket the many citizen benefits and governmental assistance about which they ignorantly complain. With a minuscule of education, they would learn that the word, “Socialism,” is but a term in the lexicon of political science, which equates to the governmental ownership and management of all commerce and industry; a form of political economy, never favored by any leading candidate for high public office. The system of Socialism is not an American possibility, nor is it an epithet. In fact, it is America’s programs of compassionate capitalism [as compared to the cruelty of the Natural Law of Adam Smith] that keep foreign or exotic forms of government, far from our shores.

[3] Teaching America’s accurate and non-deleted history:

It required the objective study and understanding of the virus, responsible for the recent pandemic, to enable the chemical fabrication of a vaccine capable of its future prevention. By utilitarian analogy, the unacceptable persistence of “Jim Crow”, cannot be eliminated without recognition and understanding of our history of slavery. No course of study, representing itself as bearing the name, “American History,” can responsibly omit its history of institutional enslavement of Black Africans for agricultural labor; nor can our Nation’s ongoing struggle for universal rights and equality, be taught and understood without this historical context. For the identical reasons the Nation’s historical mistreatment of the Native Americans, must not immorally and foolishly be ignored.

Those who have immorally and unconstitutionally, opposed the right of universal equality, have given the candid teaching of American History, the challenging and accusatory label, “Critical Race Theory.” Such tactically construed title, lends implicit, unattractive suggestions of accusation, acrimony and “finger-pointing,” as contrasted with the facile continuance of the continuation of “sweeping everything under the carpet.” Extending the same idiom, the rug will lie flatter, better, and more comfortably, for the benefit of all concerned, only after its appropriate and complete cleansing. Perhaps a better title for the subject to be taught would simply be  “American History,” since right-thinking Americans do not seek to add chapters to the course, but simply, to fill in the wrongfully or foolishly deleted blanks.   


    [* Our apologies to Mr. Wm. Shakespeare for the use of a name taken from his “Romeo and Juliet.”]

Post # 654 NOMADIC NATURE [poesie]**

I went outdoors with book in hand
To read and muse on a warm day
Sun-filled and bright, above the oaks
The white puffs slid; I read my book
And then looked up, the page did dance
To find the author of the kiss
That felt implanted on my cheek
I smiled the wise man’s knowing smile
To find the author was the breeze
Some questions then in me arose
About the moving clouds and breeze
What is their source, where do they go?
I realized then, man’s dearth of ken
On matters right before their eyes.

Mankind seems alone to heed,
The mundane objects of his need.

Leonard N, Shapiro N.Y. 7/19/21

** in the style of the Shakespearean Sonnet: iambic pentameter, 14 lines and a two line rhyming couplet.


Waiting with us on Fifth Avenue, and 42nd Street, Manhattan Street corner, was a well-dressed, elderly woman and a teenage girl, the girl, dressed in jeans and tee-shirt, presumedly, her granddaughter. We couldn’t avoid overhearing the following portion of their conversation, “…so why don’t you write your boyfriend a letter of explanation? usefully suggested the grandmother.” The young girl emphatically replied, “What? grandma! Nobody writes letters, anymore!” What motivated this writing is a recollection of this verbal exchange and the renewed sense that a similar response would be predictable from the mainstream American citizen.

We may have written in excess, about the tragic loss of the universally needed contact with a recognizable voice, and its familiar nuance of expression, as compared with the unnatural limitations to expression, lost by the [universal] use of electronic transmissions of digital symbols onto a small, lighted screen.  Yet, thinking retrospectively, we seem to have given relatively short shrift to the most aesthetic, expressive, and personalized, albeit the least facile, mode of societal communication, namely, letter correspondence; most especially, those that are handwritten. The salutary, aesthetic, and intimate practice of the latter mode of communication, is far more valuable, despite, or perhaps, because it is less facile, and time consumingly written, in a familiar, nuanced, and identifiable hand.

We mourn the apparent passing of the uniquely personal practice of handwritten letters, [as well as those, somewhat less nuanced, produced by typewriter] which generally, to our discernment,  affirmatively signals a major loss to man’s interactive need for mutually affirmed and recognizable identity. Its substitution by impersonal data-like electronic symbols, unmistakably reveals the insensitive hardening of contemporary society, in its costly and short-sighted, universal preference for ease and efficiency, over human individualized, expression.

There is almost a palpable pleasure and a feeling of anticipation in unexpectedly finding in the mailbox, a handwritten letter from a familiar sender. Before unsealing the envelope, there is the empirical acknowledgment, that the writer had personally taken the time to transcribe chosen words, on a selected paper, sign, and enclose them in a stamped envelope, personally addressed to you. The recalled, familiar handwriting, by its conversational style and, possibly, familiar stationery, recall the image, style of speech and the singular persona of the writer.  Perhaps the most rewarding feeling is the recognition that the writer valued the relationship sufficiently, to have undertaken the effort of writing the letter to you. Memorable letters, including, in some instances, written by subsequently deceased and revered persons, can be kept, and later, re-read, with the sense of a present mutual conversation.

Our modern, profit-oriented, industrialized, society, in the responsible and existential interest of the preservation of societal and mindful humanity, should wisely and rationally, elect to exempt handwritten letters from its recent ubiquitous, and apparently insatiable, appetite for efficiency.



The human cost of pervasive and ignorant misinformation is incalculable, perhaps far grimmer in effect than the traditionally dreaded phenomenon of evil. As eternally shown by history and contemporary events, the reluctance of mankind to adequately employ evolution’s generous gift of an advanced brain, has proven only, to yield harmful, even tragic results.

The disastrous election to the Office of The American Presidency, of an incapable, ignorant and egotistic miscreant, Donald J. Trump, empirically served as an effective catalyst for a public revival of atavistic ignorance, and the emergence of  America’s populist “underbelly” of ignorant, shamelessly bigoted, and mindlessly illiterate malcontents. His embarrassing, four-year term, has seen the creation, or at the very least, the exacerbation, of the many tragic sequelae listed below. Discernably, the entire sum of his  growth and personal advancement, after four years of the  American Presidency, has  been limited to the pernicious transmogrification of his inartful word, “Bigly,” to his perverse practice of “The Big Lie.”

Examples of the Nation’s wages of ignorance are presented by category, with some  brief commentary:

[1] Derogation of scientific advancement:

[Global warming]. It may not be possible, as a practical matter,, to address the complete myriad of tragic consequences of the Trump administration’s inability to employ basic reason and empirical experience. The problems inherent in man-made global warming were adamantly denied by the ignorant Trump, who also emphatically opposed green energy, all, to the brisk applause of the sociopathic, polluting industrialists who value profits above human health and a verdant planet. As a result of such resolute mindlessness, the goal has, by sheer necessity, been degraded from that of attempts to prevent global warming, to the contemporary exigency to adjust to it and survive its effects; these are inclusive of abnormal seasonal variance, unnatural and frequent, huge storms, flooding, rising tides from glacial melting,  significant erasure of shorelines, tragic property damage, tsunamis,  hurricanes, abnormally large and uncontrollable forest fires, landslides, power grid failures, prolonged periods of drought, unprecedented heat and frigid temperatures and animal extinction.

[Public health]: The medical malpractice of Trump, in immediately disbanding the Obama created, specialized agency, purposed to detect global epidemics, his ignorant and casual downplaying of the serious advent of the epidemic of Covid, including the discouragement of wearing masks, and the bizarre, recommendation to ingest bathroom cleanser as a suitable prescription medicine, added to his general macho stupidity, portrayed for the entertainment of his underbelly sycophants, proximately, resulted in hundreds of thousands of preventable infections and a great many tragic events of mortality.

Fortunately, dedicated medical and pharmaceutical research were seasonably successful in the development of a vaccine, capable of the prevention of the Covid virus, and its lethal potential. It will be, an enduring and indelible tribute to Donald J. Trump and his ignorant cult, that they  persist in publicly opposing vaccination and medical recommendations of masking and, by such lemming-like, knee-jerk loyalty, to the profoundly, ignorant Trump, effectively, continue to promote the virulent infection and potential mortality of the Covid-19 virus, and its recently mutating progeny.

[2] Abysmal ignorance of National and World history :

The complete vacuousness Trump’s “mind,” on the vital Presidential subject of international politics and relationships, was only matched by a similar failing in his inexperienced cabinet selectees. There was little or no thought given to historical treaties, as with NATO, The U.S – Mexico-Canada  Agreement, The Paris Accords,  The U.S.-Iran, the Strategic Forces Agreement, The Korean American Treaty, and a plentitude of others. Trump’s unsophisticated, teenage style of careless telephone “diplomacy” included a foolish, perhaps, treasonous, style of adolescent comradeship with America’s mortal enemy, Putin of Russia. As President, his clumsy, egoistic, and crude style incurred the intense curiosity, if not the actual disgust, of many World leaders, and our Nation to lose its historically prestigious place in the international World.

The mutually shared intentions of the participants in the establishment of The European Union were: the promotion of peace by the establishment of a uniform economic and monetary system, the promotion of inclusion, the breaking down of trade barriers between countries, the establishment of a unified currency and the beneficial sharing of scientific advances. These beneficial goals were an expression of a shared goal of a preventative solution to the many past centuries of bloody, and costly European warfare.

Without any minimum analysis or rational deliberation, Donald J. Trump, impulsively, joined the short-sighted, xenophobic, right-wing opponents of the European Union, in favoring its dissolution [“Brexit”]. The xenophobic breaking up of the EU has already led to many complex problems in, trade, currency, international banking, employment, and taxation, and would appear to be an atavistic and mortal error. As stated, Trump, sans reasonable basis, favored Brexit. One of its presently frustrating problems is, unspeakably, a renewed conflict between Northern Ireland and Dublin, after so many years following the extremely difficult ending of their war, over such subjects as taxes and trade duties.

[3] Damage to the foundational basis of our Republican Democracy:

The violent insurrection, which, shockingly, took place at the Washington Capitol Building, January 6, 2021, was outrageous, unprecedented, and no less than an existential affront to our Democratic Republic. The domestic terrorist revolution against the American government was carried out, bizarrely, at the express invitation of the miscreant head of that government,  Trump, himself. The ignition fuse, for the submissive Trump cult of underbelly discontents, was Trump’s neurotic, kneejerk claim, [or perhaps a Giuliani suggested and manufactured charge] that the election  was manipulated, and the Presidency, “stolen” from him by supporters of the winner, Joseph Biden.

It is frustrating and enraging to observe that the necessary preparation for this outrageous charge, was supplied by the pathological, orange-haired, snake oil demagogue himself, entirely consistent with his practice of serial mendacity, daily disparagement of “truth, and ”self-serving creation of the phenomenon of “alternate facts,” all of which was simultaneous with his daily disparagement of the responsible media. Trump sycophants, in their reductively ignorant discontent, had, by such nefarious practices, been prepared for this outrageous claim, by their cultish ingestion of four years of Trump prevarication.

The Nation and the World, on January 6, 2021, were traumatically shocked at their witness of the ugly mob violence, in which, employees and police assigned to the Capitol, were violently attacked, [five killed]  and many others incurred; injuries, some permanently disabling; together with the historically symbolic, building, being angrily damaged and defaced. What had unprecedently transpired, in lieu of the foundational democratic institution of the peaceful transfer of office, was a  malign, Trump-inspired, Banana Republic style [failed] revolution.

It was apparent that most of the rioters were members of the various, despicable, bigoted, Nazi-style, Christian White Christian Supremacy organizations, who, in sync with Adolph Hitler, ardently, seek to eliminate, communities of color, Jews, and homosexuals. These groups are the recent bumper crop of degenerate descendants and successors to, the depraved Ku Klux Klan who worshiped Hitler’s drive to eliminate all minorities, especially, blacks and Jews. The pre-meditated, tactical encouragement of these terrorists by an elected American President, however ignorant, would normally, be rationally inconceivable.  Nevertheless, the facts show that Trump had verbally supported these Nazi mobs and had brazenly [and unsuccessfully], demanded military assistance for them. Consistent with such a depraved mindset, Trump had energetically opposed all reasonable efforts to remedy America’s historical mistakes, and, attain, as stated in its National mantra, equality for all.

[4] Efforts to illegally manipulate the popular vote:

In their utilization of the bizarre-like reality of Lewis Carroll’s “The Mad Hatter,” by or the gothic erratic nature, of a surreal novel by Franz Kafka, Trump, and his cult-like minions have fully ingested his autocratic style, “Big Lie”; viz., that the presidential election was “manipulated” and was “stolen” from him. In addition to the above-discussed insurrection, they have dedicatedly entered upon an anti-democratic mission to limit votes [notably, black votes], by making changes in voting procedure, eliminating drop boxes, curtailing mail-in votes, and interfering with established voting practices, which are tactically intended, and focused upon making voting difficult or impossible, for the members of America’s communities of color; whose votes have been acknowledged to have greatly assisted in Biden’s victory.

It seems to us that the dullest of minds and, presumably, the most intelligence- challenged of individuals, might see the obvious ignorance and transparently mindless hypocrisy, between the Republicans’ factually disproven claim of a Democratic Party interference with the popular vote in the Biden election, and their present, visible Nation-wide, program of publicly acknowledged interference with the votes of black citizens. They are engaged, unwittingly, and ignorantly, in an affirmative,  public performance of an actual, self-acknowledged rendition, of the [false] scenario of Trump’s “Big Lie.”

Since, reportedly, as much as, something less than fifty percent of the Nation, are devotees of the uncouth and profoundly ignorant, Donald J. Trump, we are beginning to ponder a new question, viz., as to whether the latter is their inspirational leader, or merely, an avatar?



As our personal token of sincere gratitude to our loyal followers and, perhaps more salubriously, as a rest break from our customarily sober and, [hopefully], thought-provoking posts, we have decided to furnish this brief, selected and [reliably] funny, sample of the unique ethnic genre of Ashkenazi-Jewish humor. For readers, unfamiliar with this comic category, the distinctive feature, in addition to its hilarity, is the eternal, and often subtle, message or wry observation on human failings. We have reserved the best, two full-length anecdotes for last after the following prerequisite sampling of the genre:

A sick, and dying old man in a hospital ward, emotionally requests of his deathbed visitor: “Before I go, I would love to have just a little last taste of Mama’s Brisket”.  The visitor rushes to the telephone to call home. He comes back to the dying patient with the response: “they said they are saving the brisket for the shiva. [ trans.- his memorial service].

A high school student rushes home and proudly announces to his mother that he was awarded the role of the husband, in the school play. The mother angrily responded, “Go back and tell them that you want a speaking part.”

A German, a Frenchman and a Jew walk into a bar. The German says: “I am tired and would like a cold glass of beer.”  The Frenchman says: “I am tired, I would like a glass of wine”. The Jew says I, too, am tired, I hope I don’t have diabetes.”

A woman goes into a local bakery and asks the proprietor:” How much are the bialys?” The baker replies:” They are fourteen dollars for a dozen”. The woman testily responds:  “But the bakery around the corner only charges ten dollars a dozen”. The baker then angrily, days: “Then why don’t you buy them at that bakery?  Woman’s response: “They are out of bialys.” Baker: “When I am out of bialys, my price is also ten dollars.”

And now my promised favorites. Please take note of their practical teachings:

A grandma brings her beloved little granddaughter, Annie, to the seashore, places the beach blanket close to the edge of the water, and hands  Annie, her little yellow pail and shovel. While Annie happily plays, Grandma leisurely settles down on her beach chair, in the bright sunshine and blue sky. to leisurely read her copy of the day’s Jewish Morning Journal. All of a sudden, the sky turns ominously dark, a strong wind begins to blow, and a great,  menacing wave suddenly appears and tragically, sweeps the grandchild [still holding her pail and shovel] out into the roiling surf. Grandma jumps up wildly screaming, and, agonizingly and immediately, and prays to God for help. Miraculously, within seconds, the terrible wind dies down, the sky again turns blue, and a small, frothy, nurturing wave gently wafts Annie back to her previous spot, onshore, incredibly, still in possession of her yellow pail and shovel. The Grandmother, still tearful and panting from her previous shock and  hysteria, sobbing with enormous relief, and emotionally cries out, denks [thank] God, denks to God, then looks down at the child and then up again, toward the heavens and bitterly complains, “She had a hat!”

[The obvious moral: know when you are ahead]

The second anecdotal offering has a self-evident message:

The somber scene is set at a funeral parlor. The deceased is a male Selwin Bloom, age, 99. Bloom had been known, for decades, to be possessed of low character, guile, and as, in general, a shameless person; traits pragmatically useful in New York’s Garment Center and no doubt responsible for his success in the business. The funeral parlor is crowded with a great assemblage of past associates from the garment center with which decedent had dealings during his more than forty years of business.

The recently ordained Rabbi, conducting the funeral service is young, somewhat inexperienced, but admirably idealistic. After reciting the traditional psalms relevant to funerial occasions,  he announced to the large assembly of mourners: I would like some of you who knew Mr. Bloom, to come up to the reader’s podium, and say a few kind things about Bloom’s past life; I, myself, was not acquainted with him and have never favored generically worded and impersonal eulogies.

Not one of the hat-wearing gray-haired attendees stirred. The disappointed young, idealistic Rabbi fervently repeated the identical request, two more times and still, not one person stirred. Finally, the young Rabbi emotionally and impatiently shouted: This is impossible, there are so many people here who were acquainted with Mr. Bloom, that [warningly], if no one is willing to come up to the front and just say, just a few nice things about him, we will all just sit here, and  I will not conduct the balance of the funeral service… maybe just one good thing.

 After the passage of two minutes of silence, an aged, gnarly, white bearded man in the rear of the hall, slowly rose to hobble slowly to the front, all the while, audibly, muttering the rabbi’s remembered request, “Vun good ting, only vun good ting.” He finally and painstakingly, reached  the podium, turned slowly around,  and in compliance with the Rabbi’s request, raised his right hand and said out loud:  “O.K, vun good ting…. his brudder vas worse!”

We hope that you enjoyed this small, tart aperitif of classic Yiddish humor and easily discerned the implicit messages. They are funnier and more effective when orally presented.


Post # 650 THE SKY [IS NOT] THE LIMIT (Redux)

The media has reported that Charles Branson and five other billionaires are soon to embark on self-financed moonshots. We, responsibly, cannot avoid hazarding the presumption that the motivation for such space ventures is predominantly personal, and only secondarily, scientific, and entrepreneurial.

In an early essay,  [“It’s All Internal”] we sought to explore the attainment of the universally prized goal of “Happiness,” and noted some commonly misdirected routes seeking its destination. We declared that the popular image of the goal, unfortunately, was too often closely bound up with the concept of the sizeable accumulation of demonstrable assets, acquired by dedicated efforts, or by way of fortunate inheritance. We stated, and still adhere to the belief, [assuming the availability of sufficient means of subsistence] that happiness is the ultimate realization of personal growth and attained self-fulfillment.

The psyche of contemporary mankind is so intimately beholden to criteria emanating from the profitable production of goods and services, that, to our discernment, it entirely loses sight of the pre-industrial, natural criteria of pleasure, derived from the precious rewards of individual accomplishment. Money, to our jaded fellow citizens, not Mother Nature, causes the Planet to, heliotropically, orbit the Moon and the woodlands to resound in sweet birdsong and pleasant animal chittering. In this dystopic view, the influence and power of wealth, “makes the man” and is determinative of his importance; yet, this view, ultimately, proves inadequate, or possibly, in some cases, altogether irrelevant, to one’s empirical attainment of happiness. Popular criteria seem to be laser-focused on production and profit, a misdirected and unnatural route to mankind’s success and happiness.

 In reality, the phenomenon of “money,” exists and functions solely as a means, and not an end in and of itself. Money serves as a medium of exchange, a measure of practical and comparative value and a store of potential purchasing capability. People who, irrespective of need, believe that money serves as a competitive marker of success are never ostensibly, visited with the feeling of ultimate sufficiency, but chronically suffer from an infectious virus, demanding to make yet more. No individual, by any standard of luxury, needs billions or millions of dollars to live as desired.

Apparently, wealth and business prosperity alone, as previously observed, do not empirically result in the ultimate recognition of happiness, or of having lived a truly successful life. These tangible elements can, if needed, make one “feel” powerful if such is the neurotic need, but the candid conclusion of ultimate satisfaction and of self-fulfillment are far more difficult of acquisition. Striving for wealth and comfort is commendable provided it is accompanied by something more personally enriching. What matters is not how much one earns, but how much he can spend enjoying life experiences, i.e., doing things he enjoys. Experience seems to prove that investment in knowledge pays the highest dividends.

It is our surmise [if we are correct] that Mr. Branson and the other venturous billionaires, have discovered a paucity of satisfaction in the earning of untold sums of money and enjoying [deserved] unprecedented financial and influential success; and have therefore decided to obtain personal fulfillment by way of novel, private expeditions into outer space. If our assumptions are correct, we would more efficaciously recommend to them a novel by Dickens or Faulkner, planting colored tulips or listening to the music of Claude Debussy or Count Basie, all of which are safer and privately rewarding.

We are pleased to offer three sage comments on our theme, that seem to say it all:

THOREAU: “Wealth is the ability to fully experience life.”

PLATO: “No wealth can ever [give] a bad man, peace with himself.”

EINSTEIN: “ Not everything that can be counted, counts, and not everything that counts, can be counted.”


Post# 649 DUALITY

We are not in accord with those, exasperated, fellow Americans, who feel that all possible questions have been asked,  regarding the unprecedented, “storming of the Bastille,” on January 6, at the Washington Capitol Building. Popularly known inquiry has dealt with: the invitation to the violent protesters by the defeated Trump, the manufactured belief in purported election fraud, the eternal pathology of ignorant reductionism and racial and religious prejudice, the perennial existence of an ignorant, poorly educated and discontented citizen underbelly, the bizarre inclination to indulge in paranoidal and irrational conspiracy theory, the subject of the neurotic need for participation in tribalism and “groupthink,” religious and political extremism, personal self-interest, the inspired illusion of faux patriotism, general disappointment with personal life, hooliganism and anti-social motivations, and conceivably, other personally nuanced subjects, presently in the realm of popular discussion.

The matters listed above are worthy of consideration and comprehension to the extent that they address the various possibile motivations of the insurrectionists. However, we do apprehend useful, but unraised, questions relating to the reactive private impact on the individual participants, of the mob’s adoption of  “The Big Lie,” its avowed disrespect for demonstrated and objective truth and its ready inclination to easy acceptance of paranoidal conspiracy theories. The miscreant mob, itself, has been the subject of socio-political study since the violent event; nevertheless, we have fundamental, unexplored questions on the routine life and daily social relationships, of its unruly participants.

In our view, the most intriguing questions relate to the accepted, existentially important element of “truth.”  Early human society could not have survived without truthful communication, and neither can contemporary society.  Paleolithic reliance upon accurate information, concerning danger, food and water sources and, as well, on newly developing skills, has historically kept man singly, and as a conjoined tribe, both alive and progressive. It is an empirical fact that the implied assumption of truthfulness, has eternally and universally, been a fundamental axiom in the dynamics of society and an existential ingredient of its interpersonal speech.

General societal mores, like “truthfulness,” have been traditionally reinforced by tales and legend. The following are summaries of two such  tales, on the vital significance of truthfulness and moral behavior:

[American] “The Cherry Tree.”  [Truth] This apocryphal legend concerned our first President, George Washington. The story is that G.W., when but a youngster, impulsively, committed the egregious act of chopping down his family’s beloved cherry tree.  Despite his expectation of a sound thrashing and perhaps other punitive treatment, he fearfully, and honestly approached his father and said: “Father, I cannot tell a lie, I chopped down the cherry tree.” The tale relates that, rather than being punished for his thoughtless deed, his father rewarded him for his honesty.

[International] Pinocchio [ Falsehood]. The wooden protagonist, a puppet named Pinocchio, as retribution for the venal sin of telling an intentional falsehood, to his puppet-making father, Geppetto, suffers the ignominious punishment of a greatly extended wooden nose.

There is little question but that the bearers of the directional, avion-like title, “The Right Wing,” known and acknowledged to be apt practitioners of false conspiracy theories and “alternate facts,” are familiar with such traditional children’s morality tales and their expressions of societal reproval of mendacity.  Yet, any generous measure of  rationality, militates against credibility in their irrational constructs and faith in conspiracies, such as: that Israel is shooting laser beams at Planet Earth from Outer Space, that both American latitudinal coasts are inhabited by socialistic hippies, that the Founders intended to create a ”Christian” Democracy, that Columbus first discovered America, that Jews, funded by Soros, are out to dominate the world, that Chinese people are responsible for the Covid-19 outbreak, that liberals are in the child slave trade and are child molesters, that[ like Hitler] the pure white race is being “mongrelized” by darker skin races, that immigration is a dangerous invasion of disreputable people,[ despite the fact that our successful Nation is composed 100% of  immigrants and their descendants] that the Trump elective loss to Biden was fraudulent, despite several accredited audit reports to the contrary, that Anglo Saxon citizens and their descendants are the American elite [despite the fact that relatively few, if any,“ Anglo-Saxons” populate our Nation], that government programs of assistance and compassionate capitalism are in actuality, “dreaded socialism,” [despite the fact that they, happily, accept the benefits of such programs], that the entire population of coastal America is elitist, left-wing intellectual snobs, that the teaching of American History, should expunge its past history of cruel treatment of Black People and Native Americans, that the popular American vote should be racially culled, and so on, ad nauseum, into the dense mist of  bedlam-grade lunacy.

What, thematically, puzzles us, is the query as to what extent, far right Trump sycophants, readily inclined to displace empirical reality with “alternative facts,” and to construe “sci-fi” conspiracies to serve their personal dogma, utilize such tactical practices in their private lives? Or, alternatively, do they have a compartmental mindset or some non-computerized “App.” to switch to standards of societal acceptability, at home, with their family and friends. The most intriguing of all the unasked questions, referred to, is: are such phenomena, the product of innate nuance of the persona, or is it a volitional dynamic of convenient choice?

If we were permitted to hazard a guess, our best assumption would be that, at instances when these practitioners of “alt facts ” and far-fetched conspiracy delusions, are at home, en famille, or with relatives and friends, there is an intentional morphing, or transmogrification of [elsewhere] avowed delusional belief and tactical portrayal of persona, which, in a non-political context, is more centered and credibly, mainstream. One assumes that family members do not programmatically exchange intentionally false, alternate facts, nor expect the same of other family members, co-workers, or friends. A self-indulgent child is expected to honestly own up to having eaten all the chocolate donuts, the mother’s information concerning the price of seafood or her new dress is accepted as truthful. No fictional conspiracy theories are necessary to maintain that teachers are underpaid, or professional athletes, by comparison, overpaid, or explain a sudden change in the local school bus route, a new admission cost of movies, or the rising price of good bread. When complete reliance is not possible, family and civilized society are empirically impossible.

Upon the practical, but generous, assumption that many Republican legislators and citizens have sufficient personal sanity, to privately, recognize the acceptability of three professional audits certifying the accuracy and propriety of Biden’s win [or more to the point, Trump’s loss] or that inconvenient facts, in reality, do not become, ipso facto, false, decry the pathological inaccuracy of assertions that Israel is shooting laser beams from outer space down at Earth, that liberals are child abusers and engage in the child slave trade.

The unaddressed questions refer to the arcane dynamics of individual Jekyll-Hyde transformation, when in non-public, familial, or mundane setting. Does one change theatrical masks, as in ancient Greek or Japanese drama, or, as in Marvel comics, remove the Super-Hero costume in a telephone booth when not pursuing villains in Gotham City, or conveniently shed his skin like a snake? If our supposition of duality is correct, the schizophrenic morphing must be inconvenient and injurious to the self- image of the tactical “shape shifter.” Questions as to its dynamics and the extent of its cost to the persona of this tactical duality have yet to be raised and pursued.



Post # 648 ACCESSIBLE RICHES [redux]

At this time of disquiet and unprecedented threats to democracy, radical right-wing insurgency, and National discord, it might be a respite to consider man’s eternally tranquil but often bypassed, treasure trove of poetry. An eternally available oasis of meditative pleasure, poetry has been readily accessible to every citizen, irrespective of diverse stripe, and solely demanding the requirement of literacy. We can guarantee the singular virtues and rare pleasure derived from the reading of authentic poetry [as opposed to its faux presentations.] We will list the defining and fundamental criteria of authentic poetry, which we derived, and personally adhere to, from our studies of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, colored by the structural influence of the more contemporary, Walt Whitman.

Poetry in its simplest terms is often defined as a literary work in which special interest is given to the expression of feelings and ideas by the use of structure, style and rhythm. Another proffered description describes it as a concentrated, imaginative description of experience or emotional response, employing sensitively employed language, arranged for meaning, sound and style. We would prefer to describe it more descriptively and functionally, as the distillation or refinement of the poet’s experience or emotional reaction to the ambient content of reality [like the derivation of the essential mineral from its ambient ore]. It is a private, microscopic experience in concentration as effectively and functionally revelatory as, a held lantern in a darkened room.

As devotees and, veritable poetic evangelists, of Coleridge, we would instructively restate his basic premise or essential criteria, regarding poetry, which we consider no less than, definitional. Coleridge prescribed as the salient [and mandatory] features of poetry “word imagery and “economy of speech.” Most often, but not exclusively, these criteria are successfully accomplished by the artistic choice of metaphor, communicating the fundamental essence of the described subject by a familiar abstraction. We would offer the following example in illustration: In lieu of the expression of several lines of emotionally worded description of a beautiful young granddaughter, one might, economically and descriptively,[ i.e., poetically] refer to her as a “red rosebud on a pile of newly fallen snow.”

Structurally, in aid of procuring the intended response, important considerations, in addition to the thematic and sensitive choice of strategically evocative words, are the important considerations of length of line and impactful meter [rhythm] in the conveying of  the intended sentiment, [ viz., Henry Longfellow’s, “Song of Hiawatha,” Tennyson’s “Charge of the Light Brigade.”]   

Regrettably, we have been dismayed at the publication of far too many examples of faux poetry, in today’s print, shockingly, at times, in publications that deservedly enjoy reputations as well-written and erudite. Nevertheless, such offerings, wherever they may appear, in our respectful determination, fall below the most generous standards applicable to legitimate poetics. The use of irregular or bizarre lines of print, or the misleading employment of archaic or obtuse vocabulary, or like, exotic and misleading, alternatives to the legitimate skills of poetry, are inadequate and merely sham. Such writings despite their unexplained appearance, on the pages of estimable publications, thereby purporting to be “gold” [poetry], qualify merely as “fool’s gold” [faux poetry, doggerel].

It is our view that the intimate experience of rare aesthetic  beauty, metaphysical understanding, and, as well, the salutary diversion from the rancorous ambiance of the day, is attainable, only by indulging in authentic verse. The latter, functions effectively, in switching our dormant, sensory perceptions to “On,” and then relevantly focuses the mind’s broad searchlight on matters, aesthetically and intimately expressed, regarding fundamental and metaphysical truth, only expressible through true poetics.



We confess to an incessant rumination on the frailty and vulnerability of our Democratic Republic, as was once more, demonstrated by recent National events. The success and continued existence of a polity, or government, such as The United States, which desirably incorporates citizen liberty and basic freedoms would be, logically and necessarily, dependent upon the acceptable quality and nature of its citizens. From our historical perspective, [the rare occurrence of] democratic government, has never, itself failed, it appears, rather, to have been the people who failed the government. A most telling example is found in the mega- consequential fall of Germany’s Weimar Republic in the 1930s.

Immediately preceding the catastrophic Nazi take-over in the 1930s, Germany, like America, was a representative democracy, with Executive  [“Chancellor”] Legislative [“Reichstag”] and Judiciary branches. It is illuminating and alarming, to consider the determinative factors which led to the collapse of the short-lived [15 years] German Democratic Republic and its moral and political decline to Nazism. Inasmuch as this writing is specifically concerned with our concern about the frailty and vulnerability of the American Democratic Republic, we will merely list some of the cogent factors which are ascribed by noted historians and political scientists, for said tragic demise of the German Republic,  for the purpose of enlightenment as to analogous hazards, extant in our contemporaneous Nation.

  • Hostility towards, and within, Parliament permitting the bypassing of legislation.
  • Right-wing undermining of trust in democracy in general, and specifically, in the Weimar government.
  •  Significant prevalence of irrational conspiracy theories [viz., losing the war, socialism, liberal and Jewish secret plots, minority degradation, spurious causes for economic depression.]
  •  Acceptability of former right-wing leaders’ military leaders retaining power and influence.
  • Self-interested financial support of rich and powerful industrialists.
  • The rise of an unprincipled and immoral demagogue, having great appeal to the discontented.
  • Burning of the Reichstag so that blame could be falsely cast on others in opposition to Nazism.

It is no less exigent than a Hospital’s Code-Blue alarm, to observe and consider the clear, ominous analogy, between the listed factors and our Nation’s present vulnerability. The psychotic nightmare of Hitler’s victory over rationality and morality, are capable of eventual realization by the existence and actions of perverse White Nationalist groups,  the ignorant, wild conspiracy lunatics, the continuing influence of the defeated, autocratic Trump on his numerous and deluded sycophants, including a plethora of self-interested, elected officials [Federal and State], the ugly persistence of bigotry against Black and Jewish communities, disrespect for the vote and other basic institutions of democracy.

Not to be omitted from our grave concern, is the violent insurrection on January 6, 2021, at the United States Capitol in Washington. The unprecedented and ominous attack by several of the nefarious groups of White Christian Supremacists, Trump sycophantic revolutionaries and other deluded reductionists, to, at his express invitation, attempt to overturn Trump’s elective defeat by preventing the joint session of Congress from the delivering of the electoral victory to Joseph Biden. The revolutionary rancor was created by false and tactical conspiratorial claims, [despite three audits confirming its regularity and accuracy] that the election was, as in Trump’s deluded and groundless assertion, “stolen” from him.

Domestic irrational conspiracy theorists, seem to incessantly promote anti-democratic fiction which,  despite the fact that such inclination can be clinically diagnosed as paranoid or schizophrenic, are incredibly unbelievably accepted, by many inadequately informed and poorly educated Trump supporters. It is terrifying to observe this disturbing inclination to irrational mythmaking, in lieu of factual reality, daily reported in the reputable press. The predictable result of the ready acceptance of such Trump-inspired formulation of [delusional] reality is extremely dangerous. Unfortunately, it would appear that the Republican Party, in general, seems, strangely, complicit in this nightmare.

What we find the most maddeningly insupportable is the bizarre realization that the opponents of democracy, like the devious Weimar Nazis, are, insidiously and tactically, using the accepted institutions of our constitutional democracy, to undermine the Democratic Republic.  These miscreants are not  dangerous merely because they pose a potential threat to the existence of our Democratic Republic; indeed, they pose such an existential threat at this very moment.

With the same alacrity required to acknowledge and react to the recognizable symptoms of a heart attack, informed citizens, believing in the principles of American liberty and democracy, are charged by existential necessity and moral responsibility, to acknowledge and sufficiently react to this  forewarning of imminent danger; lest we unwittingly reprise, in our Nation, the evil, 1930’s Nazi program of destruction of the German Weimar Republic.  We see this urgency and existential necessity for immediate action, as fully analogous to the zeal, which would be called fr in the emergency removal of an old, leaky, hazmat tanker truck from the parking space of a Maternity Hospital.


* Apologies, for the similarity of title, to Charles Dickens, celebrated author of “ A Tale of Two Cities.”


In a past essay, we raised the troubling question: “What do we tell our children?” referring to the existence of the dark periods in American history, like slavery and the ”Trail of Tears” episode relating to Native Americans. We as parents of young schoolchildren found ourselves uncomfortably stuck on the sharp horns of a uniquely troubling, three-horned parental dilemma; the need to be truthful, the need to reinforce the lessons learned at school, and third, our knowledge of the dark periods of American history; the latter, not part of any school curriculum

The history of our Nation has, eternally and exclusively, been presented to young students in a rosy, “Golden Books,” or “Hallmark Cards” context, completely excising the dark periods. It is in later years that many children become aware that America has a less than a perfect score in its morally acceptable history;  the reaction to such new awareness empirically varying with the moral component of the informational source and that of its socialized recipient.

In our case, as parents, we dealt with the uncomfortable dilemma, by simply telling our children, that the United States of America, despite its earned history of moral World leadership, experienced these specific dark periods in its past, which it would not, and legally could never, repeat; regarding which it has been continuously engaged in the ongoing process of amelioration.

A great deal of ignorant hot air has been circulated, by the Trump supporting, bigoted right-wing regarding the inartful named subject of “Critical Race Education,” to the alleged effect that such educational courses will promote further divisiveness, will paint the white race as shamefully bigoted, and will cause unrest resulting in black retaliative violence; none of which is logically supportable.

In order to develop a vaccination against Covid, the dangerous virus, initially, had to be recognized and scientifically understood. By applicable analogy, the recognition and objective study of the existence and nature of black enslavement is vital to its extinction. Right-thinking Americans will not be divided, rather, they will welcome such education; just as they would have ardently supported abolition and now efforts for universal equality. Only hard, obdurate bigots will be in opposition to such a program of enlightenment, intended upon the goal of universal equality and peace. Such teachings may prove to be a way for our Nation to atone for its past mistakes and express assurance of their permanent extinction.

It is possible that the term, “Critical Race Education,” was a somewhat foolish choice. The word “Critical” seems to suggest, ultimate accusation [and perhaps, shame and retribution] which is far from its true purposes viz., understanding and reconciliation. There are many less inciting names like, American Agriculture in  1700 to 1819, The Candid History of early America Agriculture, Racial Relations in Early America, or perhaps, a far better title, which omits reactive words of accusation.

Furthermore, the entire issue surrounding the inclusion of the subject “Critical Race Relations,” [or some more diplomatic name] has not been presented in the proper context. The inclusion of such studies, inarguably, would not entail the “addition” of a new subject to the High School or College teaching curriculum; more accurately presented, it would amount to the “restoration” of a significant subject which had been politically omitted from instruction in American History. To study history for the purpose of not repeating its mistakes, we must deal in reality and avoid the creation of fiction.

It is compellingly instructive, to us, that the Nation of South Africa has successfully undergone an Official Nationwide period of confession and reconciliation, relevant to its past institution of Apartheid, and likewise, the German Republic has officially recognized and admitted its Nation’s past atrocities during the Holocaust [in fact, it has enacted criminal legislation regarding the public expression of related bigotry]. The United States of America, the self-appointed and internationally recognized, avatar and guardian of liberty, could only further enhance its image, by doing likewise.