plinyblogdotcom

[Dream Sequence]: Donald J. Trump and his Deputy Chief of Staff, Stephan Miller, are ernestly engaged in a didactic discussion of the classic behavioral admonition contained in Emanuel Kant’s esoteric ” Prolegomena To Any Metaphysics,” when the Press Secretary, Karolyn Leavitt, throws open the gilded doors to the Oval Office, hysterically proclaiming that the President’s Executive Order, directing major physionomic alteration to New York’s Statue of Liberty and a relevant official change of name to ” The Winner, Donald Trump” was turned down by governmental authoritires for divers reasons, not the least of which is the predictable outcry from feminist groups as well as the influential N.Y.C Tourist Souvenir Association.

In the dynamics of the contextual dream, thge sleeper, Donald Trump, wisely avoiding the highly predictable negative publicity from relevant historical societies, tourist companies, immigrant organizations, as well as the cheap souvenir sa,\]les companies,, he rejects the retributive advice of his outraged Cabinet to expunge the name and verses of Emma Lazarus from the edifice and, as further retribution, expulsion of her name from the illustrious list of famous American poets. In the dream, the outraged Chief Executive expostulates, angrily, that he would, however, retributively ban all depictions of New York’s East River from Federal Buildings. The latter restriction had fortuitously appeared to him, the moment he awoke from one of his sundry, irresistible afternoon naps.

Additional empirical, non-soporific misfortunes of the horrific day, consisting of a recent scientific study demonstrating that orange hair dye is irretrivably toxic and unhealthy to human cognition, the discolvery of greasy three red ties, irretrievably lost to greasy ketchup stains from the morning’s regular ingestion of McDonald hamburgers, and two broken nails suffered by Melania, aggravated the bleak advice that the superjet graciously given to him by Katar. was an irreparable “lemon” whose potential flying altitude, on a good day, was incapable of exceeding fifteen feet from the ground; the latter prognostication constituting the proverbial “straw that broke the camel’s back.”

Trump then, angrily and dejectedly, locked himself away in one of the gold-leafed executive bathrooms and there, unsuccessfully attempted to mitigate his despicable loss of face by aggressively and imperially, brandishing his thickly imprinting black “Sharpie,” mandating that all unemployed citizens be subject to a government-ordered draft to serve as caddies at his golf clubs, and notably, outlawing the “treasonous” ingestion of kale and broccoli.

Nor could his afternoon Presidential Conference with his erudite cabinet fare better; the marshmallows kept melting in the fire and falling off the stick. It ain’t easy to shoulder the awesome responsibilities and infinite duties of the American Presidency; you can ask the beleagured Donald Trump for indignant confirmation.

-p.

A “mirror” is universally known as an examined surface that bounces light back to a reflective image of a subject in front of it. It is routinely used in mundane activities such as shaving, dressing, applying makeup, or simply taking a quick glance. The mirror reflects the subject examined by virtue of its fabrication, i.e., its physical appearance, albeit optically reversed. The utilitarian feature is in affording the current appearance of the displayed image of which is an objective reflection.

The aforementioned declaration, while admittedly tautological, is contextually relevant to this writing by reason of the dystopian impact of the bizarre, distorted, reflective features of the singular,orange-tinted mirror of reality, employed by the dystopian American President, Donald Trump. Such a singular device bizarrely reflects back Trump’s desired images, albeit illusory. Examples are the current existence of lower of lowered consumer prices, the irrefutable well-being of the Nation’s citizenry, the extant international veneration for America’s present policies and executive pronouncements, as well as the irrefutably salubrious state of the Planet. The Trumpian orange-tinted mirror neurotically reflects a delusional picture of reality, subscribed to by the myopically egocentric persona of the delusional, sitting President.

As a cogent, impactful example, the reader will, no doubt, recall Trump’s regular propagandistic references to the immigrants from Central and South America as “Caravans of perverse criminals and rapists.” The immigration policies of our Nation have eternally required streamlining, but the demagogic portrayal of “caravans” of undesirables has never been empirically demonstrated. We might observe that the overblown effect of problematic immigration has,, for the devious Donald J. Trump, merely a tactically useful (and apparently effective) ruse for the hubristic assertion of unconstitutional, authoritarian power.

Thus, when authoritative studies revealed that the Nation’s immigrant population generally proved to be law-abiding, productive, tax-paying citizens, the orange-tinged mirror was responsively and magically re-oriented to reflect the egregious “Caravans” of federally appointed masked hoodlums, permissively wreaking misery and tragedy upon the hapless Hispanic population of hard-working, tax-paying, law-abiding, and military-serving Hispanic residents.

Trump’s private, masked army of hoodlums has demonstratively responded to Trump’s orange-tinted delusional mirror by its unwarranted and Gestapo-like tactics practiced against peaceful Hispanic families, including harassment, physical abuse, arrest, and incarceratioin, family separation, physical abuse, and banishment, illegally and without a particle of due process. Trump’s masked brown shirts asrny in reality have acted cruelly and fascistically in an unconstitutional and immoral manner, pursuant to Trump’s perverted, orange-tinted mirror ofsubjective reality.

Trump must be soundly defeated by the traditional American voter; we are confident that his singular preoccupation with his nefarious, egocentric, orange-tinted mirror will eternally prevent him from the awareness of the objective significance of multiple thousands of dedicated American citizens protesting, in cold Winter, against his dystopian, authoritarian, and delusionally egocentric rule.

-p.

.

The literary phrase, “Hoisted by his own petard,” which memorably appears in Shakespeare’s “Hamlet,” means, in modern vernacular, defeated by your own mischief. It is notable that, in addition to the dual modes of resisting the imminent threat to the Nation of totalitarian power, public demonstrations of dissent and personal, systemic abhorrence of autocracy (see: immediately preceding writings), there yet exists a third, especially effective, weapon, Donald J. Trump himself.

Over slightly less than two centuries of the nation’s history, the American citizen has developed certain fundamental expectations regarding the conduct and public character of the Presidency, regardless of policy or affiliated party. As the discerned face of the Nation, his comportment and choice of policies are empirically required to be rational and consistent, and thereby understandable, enabling relevant reaction, positive or otherwise. In dynamic principle, it would pragmatically appear to be easier to respond to a negative than to an inconsistent motivation. It is said that Nature abhors a vacuum, and by analogous reference, political relations mandate reasonable consistency.

Trump’s irrational and bizarre international behavior has certainly not inspired the unequivocal respect and expected endurance as Chief Executive of the most powerful and consequential Nation on the planet; his equivocation regarding the support of beleaguered Ukraine, his on/off bromance with Russia’s Putin, his hubristic ideations concerning the acquisition of Greenland, and making an American State of our sovereign neighbor, Canada, of inilaterally re-naming the Gulf of Mexico, his unsauthorized bombing of Venezualen boats at sea, his unilateral bombing of Iran, Nigeria, Somalia, Yemen, kidnap of Nicholas Madero, without Congressional authorization and his remarkably deluded demand, nonetheless, for the Nobel Peace Prize, affiirms the conclusion that his reality orientation shares the clinically diagnostic level of the proverbial “Emperor With No Clothes.”

Trump’s hubristic and ignorant travesties of human reason and developed standards of societally acceptable behavior have been previously, excruciatingly, and shamefully detailed at length and need no supporting or redundant reprise in this writing. The huge throngs of dissenters angrily occupying the icy cold weather streets and avenues across the Nation, furnish incontrovertible evidence of Trump’s universal disdain, based upon such unconstitutional and immoral behavior.

The most proximately convincing evidence supporting Trump’s permanent removal from office and appropriate punishment is blatantly supplied by the empirically self-immolating Trump, himself, who, in the Elizabethan terminology of William Shakespeare, is “hoisted by his own petard.”

-p.

As loyal and concerned American citizens, we are heartened and encouraged by the copious number of huge citizen demonstrations of opposition to the Trumpian-Fascistic pandemic, toxicly infecting our precious and uniquely humanistic body politic. Ardent opposition to authoritarian governance is irrefutably demonstrated by the spontaneous and outrageous reaction to the dystopic outrageous policies and actions of the egomaniacal neurotic, Donald Trump, and his compliant menagerie of freak-show Cabinet Ministers. Any conceivable doubt about the protestors’ ardency and sincerity is empirically dispelled by the televised view of the many thousands of Minnesotans demonstrating in sub-zero temperatures.

We applaud spontaneous expressions of patriotism for democracy and opposition to the developing autocracy under Trump and deem them of existential importance to the restoration and endurance of America’s historically venerated Democratic Republic.

Yet, contextually, we would responsibly urge the simultaneous opposition to autocracy on an internally resolute basis. An autocratic seedling cannot take root and grow in resistant environmental conditions, and internally principled resistance to the noxious weed is vital to its necessary withering and non- invasiveness. It would be ultimately tragic to ignore or facilely accept or haplessly adapt to the democratically debilitating toxicity of this politically lethal disease, whose predictable etiology is to sicken the body politic with its insalubrious deprival of natural liberty and freedom of action. A totalitarian polity cannot empirically exist without a compliant population.

The ultimate guard rails of our precious Democratic Republic is the systemic existence of individual freedoms; matters to be internally established and, when appropriate, publicly expressed. No mainstream citizen is responsibly exempt from its assertion, publicly as well as its fundamental assertion, as preventative internal medicine.

-p.

Despite the evident distinction in purpose, form, and dynamics between a literary book comment and the stereotypical blog, for present, contextual purposes, we would briefly refer to a modern resonant novel by John Steinbeck, “The Winter of Our Discontent.” Such a reference also confirms the universal observation that good literature reveals mankind’s universally timeless issues.

For those who have yet to read it, the novel, in essence, criticizes the corruption and materialism of modern American society, contrasting it with our traditional American values, and examines the conflict between privately held morality and the desire for profit or position.

The contextual utility of the book’s universal theme is observably realized in the dynamic assessment of the high degree of dismay of mainstream America, relative to the extant state of our traditionally venerated Democratic Republic, under Trump-MAGA rule. The empirical understanding of this dissonant condition would seem to be essential to efforts at its beneficial amelioration.

In a Nation “governed by and for the People,” it is fundamental that the people, in terms of education and informed awareness, are inclined to inspire a suitable choice of leadership.. As Thomas Jefferson admonished, the success of a Democratic Republic requires a literate and informed public. We heartily agree, but where, lately, did we go wrong? Can we return to the American traditional way of life? Our answers are in the affirmative if we, as a Nation, notably desire to do so.

History recalls to us that the radically free and democratic polity created by our Founders employed a governmental architecture and design meant to last as long as its citizenry philosophically and empirically warranted. It is our sad observation that such an intention has, (hopefully, only temporarily) taken a back seat to a ubiquitously singular citizen preoccupation with purported convenience. The latter condition has empirically proven to be hazardous to democracy.

In earlier writings, we observed the jejune error in the optimistic predictions of the Founders. Their assumption that informed citizens would amicably and dutifully debate the contested issues of the day, and that the results would be a useful and relevant guide to a Nation, dedicated to governance by and for the People. As unfortunately experienced, citizens with disparate opinions on issues such as abortion rights, guns, immigration, gender rights, and the environment developed groups of like opinion, engaged in a “cold war” style enmity with other like groups of divergent political and social opinion. The salubrious benefits of debate or political conversation on controverted issues were conveniently eschewed in favor of peaceable, but useless, competing “groupthink,” or facile accommodation.

The widespread metastasis of such pernicious social disease, invasive of the body politic, was discernibly enhanced by the unhealthy depersonalization of communication by the use of digital, rather than salubrious, affirming, personal interaction. The many vital emotional and psychological benefits derived from the practice of natural, emotionally satisfying human interaction were sadly surrendered in favor of facile, albeit emotionally and socially unsatisfactory, impersonal digital contact. The consequence was the societally atavistic return to singular loneliness; the general perception of a healthy communal life morphed into a lonely mission for personal success and ephemeral pleasure.

As we perceive it, the resultant perception of insecure, solitary, and vulnerable existence was ripe for demagogic influence and exploitation. Absent some useful understanding of the eternal human condition, the individual is left feeling rootless and vulnerableto the cruel vagaries of chance. Without the philosophical assurance of classic experiential reality, man’s aspirations are haplessly constrained to survival and the achievement of material success. Man becomes a vulnerable “Lone Ranger rather than an assured, shared, societal participant.

Attracted by this modern, superficial morass, like a bumblebee to a yellow daisy, appears the demagogic snake oil salesman and accomplished grifter, Donald J. Trump, hungry for power and perceived adoration, proposing an American Valhalla to the vulnerable and grievance-ridden populist voters. Tragically, and by reason of the lack of contemplative mitigation by the learned classic and timeless human perspective is bizarrely, elected. The sad results, ubiquitously observed in prior writings, are only too well known.

Analogous to the thematic “Winter of Our Discontent,” the American society, under Trump, has, in large part, descended to the contextual level of competition between avowed morality and humanism and individual material benefit and desired status.

What is clinically needed are programs of societal (as opposed to solitary) activity, a renaissance in personal advancement by reading enjoyable and experientially enlightening literature, joint social activities like picnics, publicly attended events, public and private, respectful discussion of current events, and a shared faith in the traditional benefits of education, tolerance, and human empathy.

Voters with such, beneficial traits would bring a desirable,” seasonal” improvement to our present “Winter of Discontent,” and a salubrious renewal of the traditional American seasonal calendar of individual liberty and universal brotherhood.

-p.

In the present era of the billionaire, including the President himself, Donald J. Trump, has seen fit to mercilessly cut the government food stamp program, “SNAP,” by the reported astronomical amount of 186 billion dollars over a period of 10 years. He has also threatened to withhold State funds unless certain inappropriate disclosures are made regarding citizenship and employment. Statistics indicate that food insecurity is at its highest level since America’s Great Depression.

It is also known that our hubristic President, whose singular personal celebrity requires performance in golden bathrooms, has eliminated the USAID program, traditionally furnishing medical and food assistance to the needy in foreign countries. In our view, the vast multitude of Donald Trump’s acts of cruelty and immorality are not as emotionally or morally indigestible as his atrocious acts of food deprivation to the hungry.

Trump’s dystopian acts of political and financial irrationality; his undermining of the constitution and the rule of law, his cdemonstrated lack of societal moral compass, his improper and illegal use of the highest office to astronomically magnify his wealth, his serial mendacity, his brisk commerce with prostitutes, his seditious invocation of violent insurrection, followed by inappropriate grants of pardon to the supportive offenders, his sub-rosa payment of “hush money” to conceal his brisk commerce with prostitutes, his fascistic program of “retribution” against p[olitical opponents, indeed, even his horrendous Gestapo policy toweards peaceful Hispanic Americans, in our view, take back seats to his psychopathic denial of food to needy children and adults.

• [Ref: “Weapons of Mass Destruction.”]

-p.

If, in the world of empirical reality, one were obliged to concede any capability at all, attributable to Donald J. Trump, it would be that of bluff or sub-rosa grift; an adequate awareness of such perverse qualities is singularly utilitarian in the vain search for some possible comprehension of his recondite and singular persona. His systemic talents relate to the manipulatively deceitful world of the “grift,” around which he has determined the fixed (and defensive) orbit of his life.

We have experienced that to seek to comprehend the exotic, egocentric mind of Trump, one needs to look behind his false and intentionally deceptive assertions of fact and personal intention, aware of his publicly proclaimed predilection for “alternate facts” in aid of his unwavering course of egocentric motivation.

Donald J. Trump would have the public misled by a tsunami of anti-immigrant policies and statements, ostensively appealing to the Nation’s extant xenophobic inclinations, in tactical service to his ultimate drive to increase his autocratic power. The reader will no doubt recall the tactical “caravans” warning.

It is to be noted that even an inadequately educated populist, like Donald Trump, is fully cognizant that the Nation is principally populated by immigrants and their progeny, that Trump’s three marriages (including the “First Lady”) were to immigrants, as was his father. His theatrical demagogic assertions that immigrants are uniformly degenerate criminals are patently and obviously far overstated and tactical, and demonstrative examples of Trump’s stereotypic “schtick.”

Trump has outrageously and in an entirely un-American fashion created and financially supported a masked, rogue army of aggressive miscreants to publicly wield fascistic power in effectuating his public declaration of intent to be a dictator. His paramount (if not his sole concern) is such assertion of unlimited power, not as deceitfully represented, immigration and border control. One might relevantly inquire as to the geographic relevance of the assignment of an armed horde of “border control agents” to Minnesota and Illinois.

Within the p;ast few days, two upstanding American citizens have been shot and killed by Donald Trump’s masked hoodlums, neither of whom were (criminal) immigrants. To our analytic and moral perception, the intentional murder of one of the peaceful protestors, Alex Preti, a 37-year-old Intensive care nurse, bears a notable, tragic similarity to the New Testament’s account of the murder of Jesus.

-p.

.

We, presumably, in common with other sufficiently enlightened members of human society, subscribe to the epistemological theory that knowledge is singularly acquired by man’s experience (John Locke). The presenting theme is intended to reflect our personal reservations about the empirically grounded perception of American citizenship now prevalent among our younger citizens, in light of the unprecedented events during the Trump Administration.

Since childhood, we were ubiquitously imbued with the beneficial American principles of legal equality and liberty, of personal and institutional morality, of love of country, the commonality of its citizens, the moral precedence of honesty, and empathic regard for others, less fortunate than ourselves.

As young children, our learned love of country was patriotically demonstrated, among other things, by the dedication of play time to retrieve scrap metals and rubber for the war effort during the 1940’s; we did so as systematically conjoined American children who later. proudly and joyfully, participated in the public celebrations of the Nation’s existential military victory over fascism.

As schoolchildren, we felt part of the diverse neighborhood and school, played in the neighborhood streets, public park, and ball fields, mutually revered outstanding baseball players, and regularly engaged in daily interactive personal communication. Certain contextual subjects were universally sacrosanct: family loyalty, the critical importance of education, citizen loyalty, demonstrative morality (inclusive of respect for the elderly) and, when appropriate, empirical sacrifice.

We were fortunate to be served by dedicated and capable Presidents such as F.D.R. (humanistic programs, social security, unemployment insurance), J.FK and Lyndon Johnson (civil liberties, voting rights act), and Barack Obama (Health Insurance and the primacy of education). The constitutional tripartite architecture of government was scrupulously observed; not the least significant was the legal supervisory Supreme Court of the United States, which scrupulously and apolitically monitored the application of the Fifth Amendment, together with the temporal existence of a two-party political system assuring balance and equity in legislation. We were proud members of a Democratic Republic, which was ever advancing toward a more perfect (equal) union and was an avatar of rectitude and individual liberty.

Dynamically analogous to the tragic onset of metastasizing cancer, the toxic invasion of the body politic of the historically admirable American Nation, disasterously transmogrified into one of an unprecedented, autocratic, and dystopic nature; featuring as its populist progenitor, Donald J. Trump and his loyal menagerie of incapable, corrupt, albeit mandatorily loyal, Cabinet Ministers.

The younger population of the Nation, thus presented with a distorted travesty of American stewardship, has witnessed the illegal waging of war, the ubiquitous government abuse of civil rights, the Presidential denial of certified election results and the fomenting and support of an insurrection against the Capitol, and later, the arbitrarily pardoning the criminal participants, the employment and support of a miscreant horde of masked hoodlums with the franchise to arrest and even murder peaceful Hispanic Americans, the confusion and betrayal of the Nation’s historic allies, including NATO. the ignorant and unauthorized imposition of high tariffs on the Nation’s trading partners, the extinction of empathic programs of medical and food assistance, domestically and internationally; while simultaneously gilding the White House, and insanely demolishing its historical East Wing, illegally obtaining billions of dollars of bribes, inclusive of a jumbo jet, a Presidential attack on the Nation’s institutes of higher education as well as its cultural treasures such as the Smithsonian Institution, an irresponsible eliminatation of the utilitarian Federal Civil Service, most notably, its medical research facilities, the unprecedented and, unconstitutional employment of the military for perceived domestic needs support of White Christian Militias aggressive assertion of claims of ownership of sovereign Nations such as Greenland and Canada; and among the virtualkly rndless list Trump’s apparently brisk commerce with prostitutes and unsavoury personalities such as Jeffry Epstein.

The once-revered legal overseer, SCOTUS, has, under the dystopic Trump Administration, has dishearteningly become politically and morally corrupt, the Republican Congress has been entirely emasculated and catatonic, and the Justice Department and the FBI have been perversely dedicated to pleasing the corrupt and egocentric President.

The experiential context of American governance, at present, is unprecedentedly perverted and historically non-traditional, thus causing us to be concerned about its perception and the principled expectations of the maturing American as well as his willing participation.

We had no such analogous challenge.

-p..

.

As a brief “time-out” from the vexing discussion of the disgraceful Trump quagmire, we have elected to temporarily comply with readers who have expressed a desire for additional “ancient lore” regarding our 1940’s childhood in the exotic Askenazi Jewish immigrant ambiance of 1940’s Brooklyn, New York. We may have previously attempted to verbally reprise the outdoor, savoury cooking redolence emanating from the tenement dwellings at mealtimes and the variety of comestibles sold by the ubiquitous street food vendors; however, the subject of the commercial sale of ethnic food specialties may permissibly bear some further discussion.

In Eastern European tradition, bread was unquestionably the metaphysically understood, basic life-giver, both symbolically and empirically. The breads of Eastern Europe were heavier and considerably more nutritious than the lighter breads of America and France, and indeed were the “staple of life.” The popular breads of our immigrant neighbors were pumpernickel (dark) and rye (lighter), but never “White Bread.” Challah was the special bread for the Sabbath, sweet Challah for the Sabbath, and round, sweet Challah for the Jewish New Year.

We have bitter-sweet recollections of going to the local bakery (“Segaloff’s”) each week, with maternal instructions to purchase a “two-pound rye and six rolls”, such request responsibly repeated by the elderly, toothless, proprietess, Mrs. Segaloff, in an exotic, liquified rendition; the recollection of the latter request, apparently, eternally available to the nostalgic ear of our ancient recollection.

On the same street as the bakery, “Belmont Avenue,” there stood three ethnically iconic representatives of the representative” cuisine of the local residents. The “Appetizing Store” ( baked and salted fish and savouries, cheeses, bagels, mixed salads, egg, tuna, salmon, herring, whitefish). The harmonious symphony of redolent piquancy was an unspoken but irresistible invitation to breakfast and an irresistible solicitation to purchase.

Two contextually significant iconic institutions were ensconced on the same city block, completing the savoury, ethnic mis-en-scene. These may have, to our recollection, represented the most articulate and ethnically representative institutions, beneficially afforded to the mundane lives and basic culinary experiences of the newly arrived, Eastern European refugees, fleeing from World prosecution; they were the reverential, large wooden barrels, containing, respectively, sour dill pickles and salt herring.

We have never been able to successfully replicate the taste of the dill pickles, fished out for sale from the huge redolent pickle barrel and sold for an individual price of three cents. Notably, we adhered to the empirical theory that such pickles, eaten in the rain, had enhanced taste; however, we were not able to discern whether the dynamics of the empirical result were chemical or emotional.

The fat, salty herrings had their own exclusive taste and were highly prized by our Lithuanian-Russian father, whose available caviar was “Schmaltz” (fat) herring, boiled potato, and pumpernickel bread, the royal repast of Olympian Dieties. The vendor, after fishing out the purchased salot herring from the expansive barrel. would wrap the savoury aquatic delectable, diagonally, in a page of the daily Jewish newspaper.

It has eternally been our contemplative opinion that olfactory and taste recollections are, like “muscle memory,” not the empirical product of cerebral recollection.

-p.

The less-than-genial, tight-lipped Senate Republican leader, Mitch McConnell, referring to Donald J. Trump, as reported. stated: “He is the worst person I ever met in my life.” Canada’s Prime Minister, Carney, publicly declared… “Trump has destroyed the World Order.”

For quite some time, we had unsuccessfully sought some conceivable answer to the intriguing question of Trump’s singularly nuanced persona and motivation. However, we have recently come to affirm our earliest thematic caricature of Donald J. Trump, as a life-long veritable “enfant terrible,” one who would, expectedly, kick his mother in the shins to neurotically gain her exclusive attention. Despite his awareness of its predictable retribution, the irresistible lust for childish personal attention overriding all other considerations. We are now confident that our early caricatured analogy has analogical merit in understanding Donald Trump’s systematic motivation.

In our considered view, contrary to Trump’s ostensible portrayal of himself as a confident and celebrated leader, he suffers from a neurotically insatiable appetite for acceptance and approval, with the possibility of success analogous to the ultimate inability to fill a wooden bucket rife with leaks at its bottom. Like the Grecian mythological Tantalus, the desired grapes remain, eternally “out of reach.”

Neither arrogantly overriding the Nation’s constitution and rule of law, unilaterally declaring war, organizing a private, masked army to arrest and make the lives of Hispanic Americans unbearable, aggressively employing his misunderstanding of tariffs to purportedly intimidate other trading nations, nor arbitrary elimination of the utilitarian Federal Civil Service, the gauche act of gilding of the Nation’s White House, notably, at a time when 40% of the Nation is living, patcheck to paycheck, his directed demolition of its historical “East Wing,” the arrogant and improper placement of his name on the Nation’s venerated cultural Centers, the romancing of foreign autocrats, suicidal attacks on NATO, aggrandizing threats to take over foreign sovereign nations, like Greenland and our good neighbor, Canada, his asserted intimidation of our Nation’s institutions of Higher Education, and Cultural Centers, demands for the renaming of the Gulf of Mexico and senseless intimidation of Panama, his autocratic elimination of funding to National Educationa Radio and Television, nor his bizarre assertion of entitlement to the Nobel Prize, has sufficed to assuage his insecure and eternally frustrated need for admiration. The law of gravity seems bent on leaking all of the watery substance of his desperate acts through the eternally present leakholes in his empirical bucket.

We have come to the empirically based realization that, to the exclusion of other conceivably laudable aspirations, such as a sense of competent achievement, moral reverence, honor, and recognizedly wise mature judgment, contrastingly Trump’s desperately nuanced thirst for general approval as a “winner” has been the singular North Star in his lifelong misdirected voyage to the land of perceived potential sainthood or reverential honor. The more impure water added to the leaky bucket of his neurotically monomaniacal need, the more leaky his biographical bucket.

The “leaky wooden bucket” analogy, we have, at last, come to realize, is the dynamic motivation for his insatiable egocentrism and the systemic attribution for his dystopian behavior. Regardless of his asserted bravado and vociferous pretension, the underlying dynamic energy source is fear and infantile insecurity.

We must be more selective in our acceptance of Presidential aspirants.

-p.