The time-worn Anglo-French linguistic pun, “One man’s fish is another man’s poison” (“‘poissone”), is inarguably inapplicable and principally inappropriate to our clearly expressed, definitional word, “insurrection” ( also in the French vocabulary). It is to be dynamically noted that merely protesting and contextually engaging in acts of violence, as such, does not properly, or legally, constitute an insurrection, nor, notably, does an influx of undocumented immigrants constitute a rebellion.
Donald J. Trump’s hubristic maniacal aspiration to expand his personal power as Chief Executive by autocratically prosecuting and purging immigrants (with the sociopathic enthusiasm and aid of his Eichmann-like cheerleader, Steven Miller) has tactically and falsely invoked that designation relative to sundry instances of American citizens legally exercising their constitutionally assured franchise to petition the government regarding their grievances.
Trump, a systemic desecrator of empirically developed norms and statutory proscriptions, has grossly violated the foundational Federal Law known as “Posse Comitatus,” which prohibits a President from employing the military to enforce domestic policies. In a grossly autocratic manner, he has sent Marines and National Guard to the City of Los Angeles to quell demonstrators, constitonally engaged in protesting his draconian immigration policies of punishment, and banishment of foreign born American residents to torture prisons,in other countries, based upon unproven allegations and notably, without the exercise of due process.
One cannot fail to experience sheer frustration in the recollection that an undeniably patent and violent “insurrection,” against the American Government took place on January 6, 2021, at the D.C. Capitol Building, notably, at the express request and with the full support of Donald Trump; following his neuroticly, unbearable loss of the Presidential election. Capitol police suffered death and traumatic injury in their dutiful and dangerous attempts to quell the acts of violent rage expressed by the Trump-inspired rioters. Prominent among the thousands of insurgents were the members of the nefarious National White Christian Militias, “The Proud Boys,” and “The Oath Keepers.” In addition to the many Capitol police seriously injured or killed, property damages reportedly exceeded 2,17 million dollars; before Donald Trump, arbitrarily decided to turn off his television set and call the resurrection off. It may be contextually noted that the D.C. National Guard was never summoned for assistance during the violent insurrection..
It continues to painfully rankle us that Trump, the inspiration, producer, and choreographer of said invidious crime of insurrection, in which he was thus complicit, was, as President, constitutionally invested with the temporally unjust and bizarre power to fully pardon all of his inspired fellow criminal participants.
Donald Trump’s falsely reductionist charge that the citizens of Los Angeles, in their outrage at his atavistic Gestapo tactics respecting peaceful immigrants, are waging an “insurrection” rather than a constitutionally protected act of petition is, as not unusual in his case, tactically false and self-serving. The arbitrary pardon of the January 6th rioters, in rational contrast, is an irrefutable revelation that Trump’s falsely subjective charge of “insurrection” is empirically and legally false and self-serving; and, if, conceivably, rational, ideologically delusional.
The subjective inconsistency is consistent with Trump’s fundamental and systemic incapacity to discern empirical reality, due to his singular, monofocused, neurotic drive to acquire monarchical, unlimited power. This toxic hubris results in Trump’s toxic mental and spiritual catatonia, rendering him a clear and present danger to humanistic society. For this reason, we have often descriptively and dynamically referred to this grossly inappropriate occupant of the Oval Office as the “Orange Hazmat.”
-p.
plinyblogdotcom 