We have empirically confirmed the accuracy of our earlier perception of Donald Trump as an archaic, pre-octoginarian stereotype of a lifelong “infant terrible”; an insecure toddler who, despite the predictability of retributive punishment, kicks his mother in the shins to further his insatiable desire for personal attention.
It is empirically indisputable that the orange narcissus has never, in his neurotic 78 years of life, evinced any political or doctrinal sentiment. He has been dynamically and exclusively motivated by his preoccupation with himself, amounting to a neurotically insatiable desire for significance and adoration. Our observation seems to be an empirically satisfactory explanation for the etiology of his abnormal aberrant behavior. both socially and of far greater impact, politically. While it is rationally impossible to ascribe any philosophical or political motive underlying his aberrant, unsocietal, and amoral presentation, it is undeniably clear that his neurotic aspirations fuel his public perception of God-like significance and universal admiration. Sometimes, he doubtlessly perceives, you have to “kick shins’ to get there; by befriending notorious (but flattering) National enemies, inculcate and support a national insurrection or perversely declare to a Nation known for its singular and unprecedented democracy, his radical intent, if democratically elected, to be a “Dictator.”
It is truly ironic to be empirically driven to the conclusion that the complete absence of cognitive detection, in favor of his singularly neurotic drive for public adoration and independent significance, that fuels his erratic and rationally impulsive acts and his statements, all of which can be empirically and anologically deemed to have the motivation of a misbehaving child’s ( “un infant terrible”) constant qauest for universal notice and palpable significance.
It is our view that this perceptive understanding accounts for many of the disturbingly unsolvable dilemmas surrounding this erratic persona. His uniformity of action, evincing antisocial behavior and lack of societal morality, may be the flypaper to which our significantly large population of eternally dissatisfied underbelly populists adhere. The glaring impotence of the many able Republican members of Congress to act reasonably to prevent Trump from destroying our Democratic Republic may be explainable by their inability to comprehend Trump in his non-stereotypical role of partisan President, but, as a sui generis abnormality, dynamically analogous to performing actors on stage but without a script.
As expressed in our earlier writing, it is sophomoric and irrelevantly inappropriate to counter Trump with rationally engaging, responsible, and traditionally established argument, even to the extent of tautological reality. Such an ongoing contextual approach has been noticeably feckless and inapposite.
Donald Trump is a dangerous and hazardous anomaly to the existence of our uniquely rational and just American aspirations and way of life, This dilemma is a notable affirmation of our often expressed recommendation that all Presidential Candidates (like applicants for mundane employment), as a prerequisite to run for the highest and most consequential office in the World, be thoroughly vetted by an appropriately designated procedure.
-p.
plinyblogdotcom 