The broad and varied range of Man’s respectively nuanced personality and characteristics may conceivably be limitless, Observations such as personal appearance, either, outgoing or reclusive, agreeable or contrary, kindness, and empathy versus cruelty and selfishness, curiosity and openness, compared with adamant atavistic reductionism, matters of skill or profession, racial, ethnic or national identity, gender, and sexual preference, dynamism versus stagnation, talented or incapable, indeed, too many adjectival references to possibly recite.
It may be an inevitable phenomenon that individual exercise of judgmental and possibly, determinative, is dynamically related to the particular persona of the observer; nevertheless, it can be permissible to say that fundamentally, discreet descriptive references, tend to be empirically derived on a societally shared basis.
Judgmental perception of others often may occasionally draw upon temporally controversial issues. As an illustration, during America’s abolition period, the description of someone as a “teetotaler,” might be perceived as an observation that the person, in addition to not being an imbiber of alcoholic beverages, is law-abiding.; during the Vietnam War, critical observation concerned the hotly contested issue of America’s active participation, During the ravages of Covid, the observation that someone was a “non-vaxer” was an empirical determination that he was a MAGA adherent.
In relatively less troubled times, categorical signification appears to depend upon more objective, on perception on occasion, derivable from his group affiliation..The variety of identifiable referential characteristics might concern, physical appearance, demonstrated proficiencies or talents, skills, residential venue, size, profession or calling, place of domicile, demonstrated personality traits such as pessimism or optimism, sociability, or observations of physical disability, athleticism or sloth. cheerfulness or depression, wealth or poverty, youthful or elderly, educated and well-informed as opposed to ignorant, caring and empathic or selfish, left or right handed, married or single. gay or straight, interesting or boring, enthusiastic or pessimistic, graceful or inveterately clumsy, calm or hot-tempered; in short, the full range of the American-British adjectival vernacular.
Contemporary American society seems to have universally overridden the verbal plethora of potential for personal characterization or perceptive description, to the singular, reductive observation as to whether or not the observed citizen is a supporter of Donald J. Trump (“MAGA”). The prudential selection of Vice-President Kamala Harris to run for Chief Executive on the Democratic Party ticket was pragmatically and tactically wise, however, the salient issue in the coming election turns on whether or not the voters will select Donald Trump as President. “Trumpism” has become the critical and judgmentally determinative menu selection du jour. In our view, the contested atmosphere of, the Hatfields and the McCoys, Yankees and Redsocks, Abolitionists, and Non-Abolitionists, vegetarians and Meat eaters, liberals and conservatives, “:red-necks” versus “coastal liberals,” “wise” or “foolish,” dexterous or clumsy, corpulent or spare, tall or short, fat or skinny, fashionable or “retro,” and the entire compendium of adjectival dynamic pales in ubiquitous description by the dense fog of toxic MAGA mania.
The overriding concern and, consequently the reductive and paramount concern regarding Trump and his MAGA cultists is the superseding distinction may as an explanation be analogized to a family (reductive) concern relative to a family member undergoing a consequential and risky cardiac procedure.
=p.
plinyblogdotcom 