Media sources indicate that this week, a major lawsuit was filed in the Federal District Court, Southern District of New York, against the former President, Donald J. Trump. Plaintiffs are the Sierra Club, the ASPCA., and the National Culinary Society. The case seeks injunctive relief and substantial monetary damages based on the defendant’s malicious, defamatory pronouncements and televised incitement to perverse and criminal action, by his venal, public pronouncements that dogs and cats are being eaten, in Ohio, by barbaric and hungry illegal immigrants. A large, enraged group of ardent pet owners, young and old, has provided financial support for the historic lawsuit..
The plaintiffs are represented by lead Counsel for the ASPA and the Fred Rogers Neighborhood Alliance, The defendant has retained for his defense, the cat-hating, T.J. Vance, and the universally acknowledged draconian, “Darth Vader” of immigration, the arrogant, ” Adolph Eichman-like,” Steven Miller.
The gravamen of the plaintiffs’ joint and several allegations charge the wrongful making of certain defamatory declarations, intentionally or in a grossly irresponsible manner, proximately’ causing personal and emotional suffering imposed upon the universe of American pet owners, the generations of householders containing much- beloved and life-affirming cats and dogs,; the latter, with especially egregious effect, on children, the elderly and the home-bound disabled The offensive inte false declaration to the American Nation that Haitian immigrants are eating household pets, in Ohio. As pleaded by the culinary plaintiff, such false, and disgraceful declaration, as alleged, relates to the brutalization of the wholesome act of dining and the creation of a paranoid-like, conspiratorial ideation that one has to defensively monitor meat meals for possibly included roadkill.
Donald Trump, through his errant and cultish attorneys, reflexively, alleges several purported, defenses, predictably asserting as his singular trademark response the alternate facts viz., (1) a falsx denial of the publically broadcast statement, (2) the plaintiffs’ assertion that he declared that Haitian immigrants are eating household cats and dogs, is a “witch-hunt: that what he really said was that Haitian immigrants eat hot dogs at Katz’s Delicatessen and that either Biden or Harris had tactically created the false story, loyally published by the “left-leaning” media.
The case proceeded to trial, before a non-partisan (and notably, handicapped) Judge, following the conclusion of Trump’s predictable delaying tactics, engineered by his MAGA-inspired attorneys. There was heart-rending testimony for the plaintiff by several pet-owning, handicapped children, an elderly, sight-challenged witness who testified to his mandatory dependence on a seeing-eye dog, as well as compelling testimony from the ASPA and an animal expert from The Sierra Club.
The defendant’s attorneys merely called as a defense witness the smirking, cosmetically-tanned, orange -dyed hair, Donald Trump, who, with his characteristic body language and irreverent smirk alleged the distorted and irrational assertion, quoted above.
The Judge, as was empirically predictable, ruled against the defendant, and in favor of the plaintiffs, unprecedentedly, holding that Trump, together with his two “sordid attorneys” reimburse the plaintiffs in full for legal costs and expenses in the case and, remarkably, sentenced both defendant Trump and his two reprehensible attorneys to thirty monitored days of animal cleanup at the local petting zoo.
-p.
plinyblogdotcom 