Month: November 2024

Our mantra, “One Nation, Indivisible,” as we perceive it, is a definitive declaration of political unity, but not contextually exemplified by universal similitude. A more empirical statement of the American Nation is revealed in its (est. 1782) motto, “E Pluribus Unum.” The latter reflects a cultural observation of the dynamic conglomeration of ubiquitous cultures and ethnography that notably, and singularly characterized the universal perception of the American Nation.

Clearly, joint national identity and citizenship are not empirical indicators of homogenous attainment of spiritual or intellectual advancement. In sum, there is a conceptual distinction between mutually shared citizenship and the qualitative nuance of individual capability for the enlightened perception of reality and its presenting events.

Our perpetual theme has concerned the route to the satisfaction of the universal aspiration for a meaningful life by learning from experience, study, and the beneficial addition of a fulfilling interest beyond the confining constraints of familial, professional, and financial responsibilities. Refraining from the latter, results in a waste of potential advancement, and, as well, the diminution of one’s societal value.

In sum, the endurance of a democratic polity, viz., one,” by and for the people.” mandates a population evincing informed and mature (educated) judgment. We have often referred to Thomas Jefferson’s prescient admonition to such effect.

Notably, the American Nation has been successful for nearly two centuries as a consequence of of its wise and utilitarian democratic policies, notwithstanding its eternal challenge of a historic huge underbelly of uninformed, undereducated citizens; the latter, lacking informed perception and maturely developed judgment. Such failings are faithful predictors of limited quality of life and the consequent development of feelings of meaningless existence, grievance, and defensively projected blame. It is disheartening to admit that our great Nation has eternally suffered from such a populist and democracy-challenging, agglomeration.

From time to time, a demagogic snake oil salesman has appeared on the American political “mis en scene,” to, perniciously capture the adulation and obedience of an extant conglomeration of systemically discontented populist citizens. The recent, contextual, and perhaps the most alarmingly dangerous, iteration is evidenced by the [political emergence of Donald Trump.

Remarkably, Trump’s demonstrated egocentrism, empirically proven incompetence, absence of any moral compass, and, articulated sense of personal grievance, have attracted a virtual worship of the Nation’s sizeable inventory of populist underbelly citizens, bearing perceived grievances of their own. Indeed, it would seem that the societally aberrant proclamations and errant behavior of Trump have bizarrely elevated him to a sizeable conglomeration of such inadequately educated, grievance-laden citizens, to the (democratically) hazardous extent of cult worship.

We have considered the significant opinionate in the ubiquitously varied, esoteric views expressed by the recognized “media experts,” as to the causation of Vice-President Kamala Harris’ loss to former President Donald Trump and will be courageously atheistic to state, with personal confidence, that we afford little credit to their stereotypical analysis; i.e., we are of the view that the “expert” media opinions of the popularly recognized political gurus are useless.

It was “expertly” predicted that:. (a) the abortion issue would unite women voters and concerned male voters and soundly defeat the Republican candidate who took full credit for the overturn of Roe v. Wade. [In empirical fact, Trump received the support of reportedly 45% of female voters,] (b) Trump’s inhumane promise to deport numerous thousands of undocumented immigrants would result in his disapproval by Latino voters, [The reported facts indicate the large support of Hispanic voters] and (3) The racial prejudice tolerated, and occasionally approved by Trump would necessarily lead to a defeat by black Americans. [The reports show substantial support from black voters.] The contextual theme involves the realistic identification of the popular dynamics of the recent vote.

Our view is that the media’s attempts to explain the election results were far off the mark, for the reason that it was, as usual, based upon rational and experiential knowledge of the recognized concerns and needs of the respective populations, The extensive error was their rationally logical consideration of the presenting political facts, and the wise and dynamic assumption that the affected voters would vote in his own considered interest.

In our view, the above assumptions are reasonable and empirically logical; but, unfortunately of little utility. The error lies in the dogmatic failure of the media to credit the general ignorance and lack of information of the prospective voters, as feared by Thomas Jefferson. Rational analysis is as utilitarian in a society inclusive of a disturbingly large number of semi-literate, poorly informed citizens, as is the vain attempt to snatch (liquid) mercury from a smooth surface, or as the young protagonist, Holden Caulfield, in J.D. Salinger’s novel, “Catcher in the Rye” put it: ” ” As difficult as shoving hot, melted butter up a wildcat’s ass with knitting needles.”

-p.

The previously unthinkable, second election of Donald J. Trump to the Oval Office, the latter individual, a publically declared would-be autocrat, offers an inarguable threat to the Nation’s unique history of liberty and democracy and a shock and disappointment to mainstream American citizens.

The incapable and shockingly immoral past performance of Trump in his previous term as President, and his subsequent errant behavior and autocratic proclamations unfortunately, proved to be inconsequential to those voters who delivered an election victory to that demonstrated egoistic, delusional, and demonstrably incapable candidate; one, with a shameful record of two Congressional impeachments, thirty-four criminal convictions, numerous outstanding criminal indictments in addition to his publically disclosed scandalous and degenerate personal life,. The latter notably includes among its depravities, serial mendacity, tax fraud, and pay-offs for the non-disclosure of his brisk commerce with call girls. The toxicity of his despicable record is metastasized by his treasonous liaison with the Nation’s acknowledged enemies, Russia’s Vladimir Putin, (who contributed money and clandestine support to his campaign,) Red China’s Xi Jimping, North Korea’s Kim Jong Un and publically declared admiration of Hungary’s tyrannical leader, Viktor Orban.

Trump’s unexpected win represents a singularly perturbing victory over democratically acceptable governmental and societal standards of moral and humanistic principles espoused by the defeated (Democratic) Party. Our dismay and personal frustration are notably exacerbated by the painful irony of the determinative issue as reported, high consumer prices. The victorious voters reportedly ignored his major role in the heartless criminalization of abortion, lack of proportionality and fairness of taxes, the Ukraine war, or Trump’s visible systemic immorality, but, rather, ignorantly exalted the perception of high consumer prices; the latter, a problematic condition having its existence in the period following the Nation’s pandemic, whose effects (and mortal danger), as universally recalled, having, ironically been exacerbated by the malpractice of the election winner. t.

Nonetheless, as salubriously emphasized by the election loser, Vice President, Kamala Harris, “While I concede the results of the election, I do not concede the fight [for democracy] it represents” and. “Hear me, the light of America’s promise will always burn bright as long as ( i.e. ” provided” )we never give up.” This wise, optimistic, and constructively patriotic declaration constitutes the theme and purpose of this writing.

We are disappointed and gravely concerned but are dedicated citizens, resolved to eschew the justified feelings of despair and desolation in the face of this seeming assault against the aspirations of our worthy Founders. Contrary to any former disappointed, pollyannaish sense of the invulnerability of the salubrious American way of life, we must maintain our faith in its ultimately eternal survival. Our unique liberty and way of life, have, in fact, been historically tested and ultimately victorious. The Civil War and Era of Restoration, The Great Depression, Two World Wars, McCarthyism, the Vietnam War, and the Pandemic are illustrative examples of our Republican Democracy’s endurance. With the appropriate measure of dedication this unique, democratic, and free nation doubtlessly, as in its previous times of trial, be emphatically and successfully reprised. Notably, such predictable success will restore and buttress confidence in the endurance of our venerated Democratic Republic; but, with a new experiential and recognizable realization of its eternal vulnerability, the hazards of which citizens of goodwill are patriotically and pragmatically obliged to be eternally watchful.

For the present, we need to sustain our hope and not react to the ill-advised populist opponents’ assault on constitutional democracy with despair; but rather with firm and optimistic resolution toward the restoration of the historically admirable aspiration of the Founders’ radical experiment in freedom and democracy. We must “show up” with earnest and confident support for humanistic democracy..

It is now, existentially important to ourselves and to the beneficial restoration of the traditional American Nation, that we eschew negative feelings of despair and of morose resolution and affirmatively, “show up,” interactively remaining optimistic and as appropriate, visible advocates of our traditionally, American, salubrious, and humanistic way of life.

-p.

In the immediately preceding blog post,: “Shiva,” we borrowed from the Hebrew tradition in describing the ancient seven-day mourning tradition, following the decease of a close relative. In the presenting post, we would now choose to borrow from the rich compendium of AskenasicYiddish humor to highlight our thematic point.The analogically informative anecdote is as follows:

[The presenting scenario is located at a Jewish Funeral Parlor on the East side of lower Manhattan,. The deceased was a well-known, ( but uniformly disliked) unmarried owner of a Garment Center Factory, Max Blum. The occasion saw a small assemblage of his family but a large attendance of former business partners, competitors, and others who, over the many years, did business with the decedent who suddenly passed away in his sleep at age 97,

The religious event is presided over by a young, inexperienced Rabbi, in the employ of the funeral establishment. The young Rabbi addresses the large assemblage of familiars: “I did not have the pleasure of acquaintance with Max Blum and personally disapprove of the practice of delivering the usual, stereotypical officious sermon. I would greatly appreciate it if one of the present attendees, familiar with the deceased, would come to the podium and speak of the decedent’s life. There followed utter silence; no none stirred. The Rabbi then repeated his sincere request two more times, only to similarly, encounter silence and inactivity,

Finally, exasperated, the young minister shouted impatiently,” Isn’t there one person of the large attendees in the Chapel who can come up to the podium and say one good thing about Mr. Blum? Still, no response, The young Minister then completely (and unprofessionally) lost his temper, and shouted:” Unless someone comes up here and says “one good thing” only one good thing, about the deceased, we will remain here and not proceed with the traditional prayers and the funeral!”

An elderly man then haltingly rose, scratching his large and unruly mop of gray hair while muttering to himself, “One good thing about Max Blum, only one good thing”. He finally reached the podium, turned adamantly to the assembled crowd, and loudly declared: “One good thing…alright,,, his brother was worse.!”]

One can reluctantly extract one good thing regarding the catastrophic result of the recent Presidential election. It is the observation that the winner, Donald Trump, and his enormous underbelly of populist supporters, in their self-interest, can no longer tactically deprecate the existential feature of democracy viz., its definitional elections.

After Trump’s highly predictable failure to properly exercise the Office of President, in the coming four years, the subsequent election in which he will be justly and resoundingly defeated will be empirically unassailable.

-p,

We woke up Wednesday to extraordinarily discover, that waterfalls now flow upward, the sun sets weekends at noon, thst frogs have hairy eyebrows and travel by roller skates, that the official New Year occurs in August, that squirrels hate acorns, jelly apples are composed of flavored tennis balls, that men’s hair combs are made of black licorice, and that Donald Trump, an egocentric neurotic with a shameful record of two impeachments, thirty-four criminal convictions and a plethora of criminal indictments, an adjudicated rapist and tax defrauder, a treasonous confidant of Vladimir Putin and other enemy tyrants, an egocentric neurotic, evincing a complete lack of moral compass, a visibly unhinged, bigoted, immoral, incapable, serial mendacious, Donald J.Trump, the champion of price-elevating tariffs, mass deportations. unrestricted oil drilling, opponent of health and environmental regulations, notably, a rebuker of the Nation’s foundational Constitution, and public declarant of intention to be a dictator, has bizarrely won a personally perceived. resounding approval of American voters to be declared President of the United States of America.

The optimistic Founders of our radically conceived, Democratic Republic are at present, according to undisclosed, albeit reliable sources, reportedly in the process of “sitting shiva,” the traditional Hebrew form of mourning, amounting to a period of one week of mutually shared sadness by close relatives immediately following the funeral of a deceased person. If one were conceivably enabled to apprehend the intimately muttered, classical sentiment now pointedly restated by ritually observant founders, Thomas Jefferson, and Benjamin Franklin, he would undoubtedly hear the reprised and sage observations: “For a democracy to succeed, one must have a literate and well-informed society” and “It is a Republic if you can keep it,” and would, in our view have the benefit of being reliably informed of the empirical causation of the presenting tragedy.

The intimate whispers of the two contemplative and mournful Founders amounted to a reprise of the historic, relevantly prescient 18th-century concerns of said two Founders. There seems to exist no more cogent understanding of the remarkably disappointing result of the subject election other than the democratically hazardous presence of a large population of inadequately schooled, and poorly informed citizens who perhaps may have valued Trump’s recognizable television identity above his empirically large and shocking panoply of egocentric and pathological lawlessness, bigotry and systemically profound ignorance.

It is our understanding that, as a consequence of such failings, viz., lack of adequate education, and the sorry state of being uninformed of the political issues, that cause the decline in quality of the Nation’s elective judgmental facility.

Before the preparation of this writing, we spent several hours listening to a myriad of news commentators opine on the unexpected result of the election: less-than-expected anti-abortion voters, surprisingly inadequate support of young voters, or women protesting the legal reversal of the right of abortion, disappointing levels of Latino and Black voters, dislike of the costly nature of groceries, less than desirable opposition to Donald Trump’s immoral character, destruction of the difference between fact and fiction, serial mendacity and unhinged declarations to set aside the constitution and rule as a dictator and more creative and esoteric explanations. Notwithstanding the same, we hold firm to the view that the implementing cause resided in the extant populist failure to meet the basic standards expressed by Jefferson and Franklin; and, in comradely spirit, join those two gentlemen and the other optimistic but disappointed Founders, at their compassionate shiva.

It is of existential importance that mainstream Americans do not haplessly amend the high standards and expectations implicit in the Founders’ idealistic and humane standards for their “radical” experiment in Democracy and passively grieve the loss of the election to a denominated “fascist ” and authoritarian tyrant. Citizens of goodwill and moral rectitude should, contrastingly, however, and whenever relevant and possible, positively assert their ardent aspirations for democracy and good government. as intended by our presently mourning Founders.

-p.

The use of the word, “choice” has been relevantly employed in the recitation of the contemporary plight of pregnant women who need or desire to abort their pregnancy but suffer the legal impediment of unconstitutional proscription of that natural right. The controversial issue, in our view, is more properly attributed to the overweening and pathological desire for power than the averred grounds of morality and religious obedience, The prohibition of this personal right of privacy and self-determination has proven to be the responsible cause of uncountable instances of suffering and tragic mortality and has been opposed under the public banner of “Right to Choose.”

The popularly known, existential, and contextual application of the “Right to Choose,” has additional relevance and reference to the exercise of many other inalienable rights of “choice,” most notably those foundationally inscribed in our constitution specifically prohibiting governmental interference and assuring the protection of the American citizen, It should require no authoritative or referential support to declare their legitimacy or universal application.

[V OTING] :

The democratic mantra: “One man,. one vote,” may constitute the greatest failure in our traditional assertions by the constitutional endurance of its roadblock, the “Electoral College.”

Five American Presidents in U.S. history have been elected President, despite losing the popular vote,.The most recent was Hillary Clinton’s loss to Donald Trump in 2006. We have read that Hillary Clinton garnered over 2.8 million votes than Trump, nationwide, but not enough key States to win the election. ( The 538 electors are determined by the size of their Congressional representation.) This constitutionally mandated (ART. 2) is inarguably undemocratic and violative of the declaration of, “One man, one vote.”.

In addition, “gerrymandering,” where shown, should be effectively criminalized, as should all species of democratic voter interference

[FREEDOM OFV SPEECH]:

The legally permissive existence of censorship is inarguably violative of the democratic feature of free speech. The profound evils of book banning and censorship in general (including the abridgment of curricula relative to all levels of education) are in principle, dissonant with our Nation’s protestations of free speech and liberty of expression. Consistent with the avowals of the Constitutional “Bill of Rights,” such arrogant, arbitrary arrogation of quasi-governmental authority is more empirically attributable to autocracy than Republican Democracy.

[RELIGION]:

The “Establishment Clause” (ART.1 ) of the U.S. Constitution expressly prohibits the government from establishing a State religion or influencing any religion or belief. Readers of American history are reliably informed that the (theistic) Founders, mindful of the European long and cruel history of established religion (viz., inquisitions, wars, social injustice, and cruelty), presciently created the referenced constitutional proscription.

Notwithstanding the clearly worded prohibition contained in the relevant Clause, American history has demonstrated intentional and demonstrative violation in several instances, One example was the “Blue Laws.” prohibiting commerce on Sunday, the Christian Sabbath. The criminal Statute provided punishment for any business enterprise (with a few exceptions, viz., milk and dairy) that chose to operate on Sunday, the Christian Sabbath, These religiously founded proscriptions were mercifully repealed after a substantial period of injustice.

A religious violation, causing substantial criminal disruption throughout the Nation was the c constitutionally offending, religious-based prohibition of alcoholic beverages (subsequently withdrawn by constitutional amendment).

[ WOMEN’S RIGHT OF ABORTION] :

The (quasi-religious) issue du jour, dramatically roiling the already divisive Nation has arisen from the recent withdrawal,( shockingly, approved by SCOTUS) of the natural and precedential right of women to obtain a termination of their pregnancy. This religious lobby-influenced policy is based upon nuanced moral-religious principles, and i; irrefutably contrary to the underlying theme and history of the Constitution, (viz., the protection of human rights, as opposed to their reduction), of human rights; and productive of countlessly avoidable tragic clinical consequences, and mortalities. Despite the clear language and philosophical context of the Establishment Clause, evinces the recent influence of the religious lobby upon contemporary SCOTUS, especially upon its demonstrably irresponsible and deceitful, Justice Samuel Alito, and has unconstitutionally and materially limited citizen choice. This alarming and impactful reversal of constitutional intent and policy, as known, is popularly identified as a denial of the “right of choice.” As we have declared, above, this, most egregious and damaging denial of choice is the most horrific, but not the sole instance, of denial of citizen’s basic rights.

As thematically shown, the latter is the most egregious denial of “choice” albeit, admittedly the most negatively impactful, is neither singular nor exclusive. We will materially enhance the “Founders”” radical experiment when these denials of choice are properly recognized, considered, and ameliorated.

-p.

There would seem to be no more inappropriate or reprehensible conceit than utilizing the woman’s existentially vital and painful service to mankind, childbirth, as poker chips in the rough-and-tumble, acrimonious world of politics. Women’s existential gift to the continuance of the human species is more appropriately venerated and protected by a firewall from matters of lesser consequence.

Sadly, the contrary has been the case due to the dominance of politically ambitious politicians with tactical and self-interested facilitation from organized religion. The latter, despite expressing foundational ambitions concerning matters of human morality, nevertheless, lends its irrationally based persuasive cogency to the common interest of persuasive control in the vital area of Man’s singular regenerative process.

The empirical process of giving birth is physically and emotionally hazardous, making appropriate and vital a separate and distinct branch of medicine, focusing on the diagnosis and treatment of diseases and conditions that affect women’s physical and emotional well-being, denominated “Women’s Health.” Notably, such a utilitarian subject is ordinarily foreign to the uninformed male.

Many politicians have callously utilized the marvelous maternal phenomenon as mere “chips” in their political poker game, heartlessly seeking personal power and influence,. Despite, or perhaps, ignorantly unaware, of the possible dire consequences of governmental regulation or elimination of this private right of women, for clinical or situational reasons, to terminate their pregnancy. and have been responsible for untold numbers of preventable life-threatening dangers and horrific tragedies.

Self-congratulatory and falsely principled citizens observably employ as the purported basis or faux moral rationale, for opposing a woman’s right to an abortion by the tactical attribution of a convenient moral or quasi-religious motivation to their true empirical and neurotic desire for influence. Notably, their avowed, foundational mission, viz., the protection of the fetus by opposing abortion (“Right to Life”)] is empirically disproven by their uniformly consistent, opposition to governmental assistance to the needy child, following the determinative event of birth. The obvious deceit in their representation of their moral concern for life is further confirmed by their uniform support of the ownership of death-dealing firearms, capital punishment, and, bizarrely, in many cases, opposition to prophylactic disease vaccination. The misleading mask of false morality is thus used to disguise an all-too-common and empirically neurotic desire for power and influence.

We are unable to morally or logically tolerate supposedly “Right to Life” adherents who tactically and cynically use religion or morality as the purported basis for their opposition to abortion, as constituting “murder,” (most emphatically those who intentionally kill obstetricians and nurses who perform abortions in furtherance of their dedicated belief, viz., “Right to Life). It is notably relevant that the New Testament does not speak on the subject. [N.B.: the anatomy and chemistry of birthing were unknown at the time(s) of their authorship].

The orange-haired egocentric, would-be Fuhrer, has proudly taken credit for the installation of morally impaired Justices to SCOTUS and by so doing, affirmatively claims full credit for the overturning of the half-century precedent of Roe v. Wade and thereby outlawing the humanistic right of pregnant mothers to obtain an abortion. He has boasted that “when elected” (heaven forefend) he will “take care” of women. Many citizens who have learned to translate Trump-speak, are cognizant that such use of the phrase,” will take care of” effectively signifies “control of” women.

In the patriotic spirit of active citizen participation in democratic citizenship, we intend to request our Congressman to apply to the Legislature for a Statute, effective next May, providing a mandatory injunction from the purchase of Mother’s Day cards by all patrons wearing red MAGA caps.

-p.

In the interest of candor, it must be admitted that the American Nation, beneficially occupying the venerated status of the avatar of liberty and democracy, has, notwithstanding such deserved accolade, unfortunately, evinced periods of repressive and censurable conduct. A cursory reading of American history reveals an unfortunate plethora of anecdotal evidence of such a reverential shrine of moral humanism, sadly backsliding into acts of self-justified inhumanity.

MAGA-inspired programs seek to abridge American history, dishonestly deleting any references to the Nation’s past moral blemishes, such as chattel slavery, Jim Crow legislation, cruel displacement of Indigenous peoples, immoral kidnapping of Indigenous children for “Christianizing,” internment of Japanese Americans citizens during the Second World War, the KKK Tulsa City Bombing, the uncountable acts of racial homicide, censorship of curricula and books on the subject of human sexual behaviors, gender disparity and homosexuality; all of which serve to identify many of the examples of autocratic-type repression or trademark “backsliding” of our democratic Nation.

Thematically, knowledge of the entirety of our Nation’s nuanced history should responsibly oblige mainstream American citizens to remain eternally watchful for the ever-present threat of decline, in the Nation’s foundational ethos underlying democracy, which empirically, seems to present itself in periods of extreme events. This pragmatic admonition includes the currently presenting danger posed by the bizarre, cult-like attraction of an autocratic and deceitful demagogue to our Nation’s large population of inadequately educated and perpetually discontented, populists.

We were relieved, recently, to hear the “long-overdue” apology from President Biden, on behalf of the Nation, for its historic, nefarious program of merciless kidnap of Indigenous children from their families for the arrogant purpose of”Christian Humanizing” (1895-1975) by heartless religious adherents. We would additionally choose to cite the wholesale removal and incarceration of upstanding Japanese-American citizens during the Second World War, and the turning back of a large shipload of Jewish refugees for certain execution in Hitler’s death camps

We can vividly recall, with great distress, the atrocities committed in the time of America’s participation in the Wars in Southeast Asia, and the unsettling Nazi-style years of the McCarthy era. We are contemporaneously aware of the proximate danger of the Nation’s armed White National Christian Militias, of policies of racial and religious prejudice, including the all-pervasive historic anti-semitism polluting the Nation and the Globe ( (persisting since the third Century, BCE), the pathological priority of profit, over human life and health, by large industrial polluters opposed to government health and safety regulation., and the overcrowded, odoriferous inventory overfilling the dumpster of human indecency to fellow Man.

These shameful atrocities, albeit incongruent with America’s mantras of liberty and democracy are often ignored by the unaware mainstream citizen, encapsulated within his personal assumptions and mundane practice of societal morality including the sophomoric and pollyannaish presumption of the presence of a universal humanistic empathy for one’s fellow Man.. He may be lulled into a narcotic- like, precarious stagnancy in his naive presumption that such idealized societal and personal scenarios are unassailable. The instances of anti-democratic and immoral travesties, cited above do not seem to occupy a vitally appropriate place in his personal sphere of contemplation. This “burying of one’s head in the sand” is a utilitarian producer of peace and quiet for the ostrich, but is productive of societal and political hazard for the upstanding,, albeit, somnolent citizen.

In keeping with our long-held view that there is little empirical support for the aphoristic declaration that the study of history is a historical panacea for the avoidance of empirically similar mistakes, we do, affirmatively declare that the value of the historical past offers a non-specific but certain reminder of the eternal danger of “backsliding,” or decline of freedom and democracy. The voter must eternally weigh the sweet taste of the fruits of liberty and democracy against the retrograde, rotten taste of an autocratic [oranger-haired] backsliding of American society in the coming vote for President.

-p.